and since you asked me to shorten my sig that way: **** NO
There are simpler and less space-consuming methods of quoting you could, and probably should, have adopted in the first place. But as you are incapable of admitting error, I eagerly await your bizarre, otherworldly explanation.
yet another example in how NOT to ask me to shorten my signature, i know exactly how to could have made it clear they were qutoations in nine million different ways. I chose quote blocks. deal with it until you you can manage to talk to me without being insulting and presumptious
[edit] let me further expound on the presumptious arrogance of this comment. I have admitted error before on this very forum, I have had other people convince me I was wrong by presenting superior evidence, and I have in the same thread promptly switched to arguing on that side of the arguing using the same evidence they presented to me.
Furthermore if I was really this arrogant "unable to admit when wrong" person i most certainly would not be engaged, and soon, married to the girl I am with - she (nor I) have any tolerance for such people.
Do not confuse high standards of evidence for not listening, just because your "Evidence" does not qualify as evidence in an argument doesn't mean I'm simply dismissing it, especially since when I dismiss "Evidence" I tell you why so you can attempt to support your evidence.
