Author Topic: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon  (Read 85264 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fear

  • 26
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
thats a solution alright, though a really bad one.

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
On what basis?
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline Wanderer

  • Wiki Warrior
  • 211
  • Mostly harmless
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
While i happen to agree that military response was only available option to the Israel i also think that they went way over the top when engaging more civilian targets like Beirut Int. airport and various water purification plants in Lebanon or bombing escaping civilians after first notifying them to leave their houses... Current situation looks like Israel is just paving the way for masses of new Hamas and Hizbollah members than actually gaining anything.

Regarding the striking of civilian infrastructure in Lebanon, I think everyone is missing the logic for doing so; Hezbollah is, technically speaking, composed of civilians as well. They use that infrastructure the same as normal citizens do, and if you want to seperate them from their infrastructure then you're going to end up doing the same to the local populace. The same thing has happened to some extent in every war since WWI. Even the military likes to use the highways.
They also gather their members from that very same civilian population that probably doesnt love Israel a bit any longer (if it ever did) after the strikes against civilian infrastructure in Lebanon. And i would guess that current crisis guarantees that Hames and Hizbollah are not going to run out of recruits any time soon.

Also AFAIK Lebanese army had practically no chances against Hizbollah.. Part of the army consist of Muslims who most likely wouldnt have gone against their brethren especially as most of the Lebanese muslims seem to share the hatred towards the Israel. After events that took place during the Lebanese civil war that can hardly be called suprising.

And no.. I havent dont know any good solutions to the issue. Just that the current solution is just about the worst.
Do not meddle in the affairs of coders for they are soggy and hard to light

 
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
So far, everything the terrorist organizations have done (Kill civilians, destroy infrastructure, assassination, Capture/kidnaping) I've seen Israel do on an even larger scale.

If Israel does give back the West Bank/Golan Heights/Gaza, then they do have something that they're sorely lacking at the moment: the moral high ground.

If keeping the palestinian territories result in violence, and giving the territories away would result in violence, at least Israel could wash its hands and say that it has done everything in its capacity short of ceasing to exist (which no one would seriously expect it to do) in helping palestinians on to their feet.

That would significantly weaken the position (moral and otherwise) of many of the political organizations against israel in the region, improve world opinion of israel, and give israel the authority to properly defend itself.

As for a solution to the problem:
Everyone here was talking about the American war in Iraq (and against Terrorism on the whole) only feeding the potential threats down the road. How for every terrorist you kill, 2 will rise from the collateral damage you cause. Israel is not some kind of magical exception.

If they would undertake serious humanitarian initiatives in the occupied territories, and showed the palestinian people that Israel was not out for their total annihilation or subjugation. Increasing the quality of life in the territories will give people a future, and give them something to lose. Reminds me of an old addage: "A man who has nothing to give can still give his life."

After all, how do you think entities such as Hamas and Hezbollah became so popular in their respected territories?

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
So you think this is going to end Hezbollah as a threat, recover those 2 soldiers, strengthen the Lebanese government enough to tackle said Hezbollah and weaken the position of Syria and Iran?

Considering the first paragraph, that's a particularly silly question. It's not like you not to read posts carefully, aldo.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060721/ap_on_go_pr_wh/cheney

Cheney continues to prove that he hasn't actually got a clue.

I love the way he's using this to basically say 'We're not giving a withdrawal timetable because as long as this carries on, we can use it as an excuse to stay in office.'.

Quote
"We have only two options in Iraq: victory or defeat. And I want you to know, as members of the United States military, the American people do not support a policy of retreat of defeatism,"

One, that sentence makes no sense, and two, even if that sentence did make sense, it still wouldn't make sense.

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
This may be callous...but I'm of half a mind to let them just fight it out.  It took Europe quite some time under the guise of modern warfare to finally realize that full out armed conflict just rains down death and destruction on your cities till there are only bits of rubble to pick up when the war is finished.  Maybe then there will be peace because everyone is sick of fighting...maybe.  I realize its a different dynamic.

Honestly Israel has few options.  If Israel pulls out of all of the major contested areas groups like Hamas and Hezbollah and some in Iran flatly deny Israel has any right to exist in the first place so Israel can bargain and use all the diplomacy they want but the people they are trying to bargain with want to see them flatly destroyed.  The only reason they haven't been totally destroyed is because Israel has one hell of a defense force and the international community supports Israel's continued right to exist.

So maybe I'm missing some facts but what choice does Israel have?  What peaceful solution can they really find that Hamas and Hezbollah would find acceptable that doesn't end in the dissolution of the Israeli state?  This is why I have so very little faith in the conflict.  I really feel badly for the people caught in the middle because they will always be caught in the middle.
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

  

Offline Sarafan

  • No Title
  • 210
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
This may be callous...but I'm of half a mind to let them just fight it out.  It took Europe quite some time under the guise of modern warfare to finally realize that full out armed conflict just rains down death and destruction on your cities till there are only bits of rubble to pick up when the war is finished.  Maybe then there will be peace because everyone is sick of fighting...maybe.  I realize its a different dynamic.


There were already 6 (I dont remember exactly how many) major wars there and all of them resulted in intense destruction, and what's happening know shows that they still have enough ''will'' to get on another one or as many it takes to crush the other side. I agree with what you said but like all wars, its the people that are going to get the brunt of this instead of their leaders that started the whole mess.

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
Let me ask you this: if Israel goes give back the West Bank, is that going to be the end of the matter?

Of course it's not an end to the matter. But it's a step in the right direction. At the moment world opinion is against Israel because the world sees them acting just as childishly as the Palestinians are.
 GodisanAtheist made the majority of my argument for me. The only thing I'd add would be to suggest that the US stops protecting Israel from the consequences of its actions. If that were done you'd probably be able to get the UN to go in and give humanitarian aid in a way that shows that someone other than Hamas can do it.

No one is saying that only Israel needs to change to do something about this but the fact is that they are not in the right on this one. No one involved is in the right. The point is that Israel could easily change it's actions to be in the right. For that matter so could the Palestinians. They'd get much further taking a leaf out of Ghandi's book than they are with their current tactics.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
So you think this is going to end Hezbollah as a threat, recover those 2 soldiers, strengthen the Lebanese government enough to tackle said Hezbollah and weaken the position of Syria and Iran?

Considering the first paragraph, that's a particularly silly question. It's not like you not to read posts carefully, aldo.

No, I'm just incredulous.  I mean, really.

Firstly, we all know Israel can't end the Hezbollah threat with military might; to repeat a phrase used by a British officer about the Taliban it's like 'punching water'.  no matter how hard you hit, it'll always ripple back.  And that's something proven right many times through history.

Moreso, the UN won't get involved because the US and UK will veto anything that even threatens to stand in Israels way. 

Plus I fail to see how weakening the democratic Lebanese government (I believe the President broke down in tears appealing of peace on TV) will do anything but strengthen both Syria and Iran through the medium of Hezbollah; quite how you'd convince Syria to stop co-operating with Iran when they are under threat from Israel, I fail to see.  If anything, the sight of an Israeli bombing campaign against a country in response to the actions of - let's not forget - a non-state 3rd party will make Syria and Iran closer allies, because Syria knows Israel are probably both gunning for them, and now would seem to be willing to hit them for that reason.

And on top of that, the bombing of South Lebanon is scarcely going to dull any anger against Israel, is it?  It's only going to strengthen Hezbollah, because we've seen time and time again that bombing campaigns force populations to band together rather than demoralise; the famous 'blitz spirit', for example.  Sure, there are  other ethnic religious groups that want rid of Hezbollah - but they always did.  And all this is doing is weakening any possibility - if not already removed - for peaceful disarmament.

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
This may be callous...but I'm of half a mind to let them just fight it out.  It took Europe quite some time under the guise of modern warfare to finally realize that full out armed conflict just rains down death and destruction on your cities till there are only bits of rubble to pick up when the war is finished.  Maybe then there will be peace because everyone is sick of fighting...maybe.  I realize its a different dynamic.

Ice, I see what you're saying but its a COMPLETELY  different dynamic. Germany was a wasteland, France had no military or government to speak of, the surrounding nations were economically bust due to either fighitng such a long war or being occupied; Britain had burned out the Empire trying to fight Germany. No one had the ability, let alone the will, to make war at this stage. With the development of the new superpowers Europe had to spend more time recovering, and making sure they chose the right side in the cold war, than blowing each other up. Once that was over, they still needed their collective power to have any sway in the world economy (with the appearance of the China and the other developing economic powers).

Not meaning to be pedantic, but it is a pretty poor example of people "choosing" to move away from violence. "Fighting it out" rarely ends the agression.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline Blaise Russel

  • Campaign King
  • 29
    • http://mysite.freeserve.com/sbre/index.html
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
thats a solution alright, though a really bad one.

Why? They both had the chance to live in the land their respective magic sky-men promised them and they blew it.

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
thats a solution alright, though a really bad one.

Why? They both had the chance to live in the land their respective magic sky-men promised them and they blew it.
Okay, but then who inherits the land? The Scientologists?!

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
No one. We sink the entire place into the Med and give ourselves a second Suez Canal.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
This may be callous...but I'm of half a mind to let them just fight it out.  It took Europe quite some time under the guise of modern warfare to finally realize that full out armed conflict just rains down death and destruction on your cities till there are only bits of rubble to pick up when the war is finished.  Maybe then there will be peace because everyone is sick of fighting...maybe.  I realize its a different dynamic.

Ice, I see what you're saying but its a COMPLETELY  different dynamic. Germany was a wasteland, France had no military or government to speak of, the surrounding nations were economically bust due to either fighitng such a long war or being occupied; Britain had burned out the Empire trying to fight Germany. No one had the ability, let alone the will, to make war at this stage. With the development of the new superpowers Europe had to spend more time recovering, and making sure they chose the right side in the cold war, than blowing each other up. Once that was over, they still needed their collective power to have any sway in the world economy (with the appearance of the China and the other developing economic powers).

Not meaning to be pedantic, but it is a pretty poor example of people "choosing" to move away from violence. "Fighting it out" rarely ends the agression.
In my mind I just see it as Europe has had quite enough of the wars over the last few hundred years that has ruined quite a few European nations and everyones been trampled on at some point.  That culminated in World War II and with the threat of another war looming during the Cold War I just see the dynamic there in terms of geopolitics headed towards economics rather than war.  I think its great that there isn't any looming wars for Europe right now.  I think there are plenty of reminders in many European cities of how terrible the wars really were.  I'm just wondering if the Middle East needs to ruin themselves to that level to finally get over whatever it is....again...the people always loose.

I just don't see an alternative I guess is what I'm saying.  Peace in the middle east is just a temporary solution till some nutter decides to blow some people up at a coffee shop or toss some rockets towards people in a marketplace or some such nonsense.  We should just move the lot of them up into the arctic circle and see if all of that stuff really matters so much.
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
No one. We sink the entire place into the Med and give ourselves a second Suez Canal.
How did we go from discussing a pressing modern political & military issue, to discussing supervillainy?!

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
Well it's only a short leap from villainy to supervillainy :)
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
So far, everything the terrorist organizations have done (Kill civilians, destroy infrastructure, assassination, Capture/kidnaping) I've seen Israel do on an even larger scale.

There's killing civillians, and there's targeting civilians. And yes, I admit that according to all reports, we killed some of those civillians we told to flee. I have no clue why that happened; I've been out of touch with local news here, so I haven't heard any explanations, mistake or otherwise. But that is one instance - an exception - up against how many suicide bombings targeted on civilians... attacks which, I might add, are not "mistakes".

Destruction of infrastructure happens in any war. We just have more weaponry. I make no apologies for Israel's destruction of bridges, etc. You want to (figuratively) cry over a bridge? Go right ahead. I'll be laughing at the bomb-wrapped terrorists standing helplessly on the other side because they can't swim. :D

Assasination. Aside from the killing of Israel's Rehavam Ze'evi a few years back, I don't recall any assassinations being carried out by the Palestinians or by Hezbollah. That's mainly Israel's doing, and I'll not have you giving the Palestinians any undue credit for it! :p

Kidnappings. We're both guilty of this. They've kidnapped and killed IDF soldiers (among them one Druze, I might add) and one Israeli citizen. We've arrested (I guess you could draw some sort of parallel) hundreds, if not thousands, of Palestinians involved in terrorism. Again, I make no apologies here whatsoever.

If Israel does give back the West Bank/Golan Heights/Gaza, then they do have something that they're sorely lacking at the moment: the moral high ground.

If keeping the palestinian territories result in violence, and giving the territories away would result in violence, at least Israel could wash its hands and say that it has done everything in its capacity short of ceasing to exist (which no one would seriously expect it to do) in helping palestinians on to their feet.

That would significantly weaken the position (moral and otherwise) of many of the political organizations against israel in the region, improve world opinion of israel, and give israel the authority to properly defend itself.

We did that. Gaza, remember? Israel's top military officers warned against it, that Gaza would become a breeding ground for terrorism, that we'd see Kassams falling on Askhelon and other cities. But we went ahead anyway, and whaddya know? It became a breeding ground for terrorism and Kassams started falling on Ashkelon and other cities. Sur-freakin-prise! :rolleyes:

Call Gaza a trial run. We - and the rest of the world, if you'd bother to notice - saw what happens when you let them have free reign. Hell, HAMAS, the organization that had been denounced world-wide as a terrorist organization, was democratically voted into power. Hel-loooo?

As for a solution to the problem:
Everyone here was talking about the American war in Iraq (and against Terrorism on the whole) only feeding the potential threats down the road. How for every terrorist you kill, 2 will rise from the collateral damage you cause. Israel is not some kind of magical exception.
Agreed. But history also proves that when you strike and eliminate terrorism hotspots, such as the various explosives labs in Jenin, the attacks are reduced drastically. On the other hand, giving in to their desires (Gaza) just spawns more attacks.

If they would undertake serious humanitarian initiatives in the occupied territories, and showed the palestinian people that Israel was not out for their total annihilation or subjugation. Increasing the quality of life in the territories will give people a future, and give them something to lose. Reminds me of an old addage: "A man who has nothing to give can still give his life."

After all, how do you think entities such as Hamas and Hezbollah became so popular in their respected territories?

I could not agree with you more. It's a damned shame that Arafat festered away so much funding meant for the people into his own coffers for so long. Their standard of living is horrifically low. I cannot imagine being in their shoes. If there were any sort of way to guarantee a significant flow of funding into improving the quality of life for the Palestinians without aiding terrorism (i.e. the huge monetary rewards families of suicide bombers get from Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc. don't quite count), I'd be all for it.

The UN doesn't have the military force and backing to put a military halt to this conflict; perhaps they should focus on the logistical side of the Palestinians. On sending construction forces to improve their cities, sending cleanup crews to get rid of all the junk Arab villiages are littered with, on sending teachers to give lessons in advanced farming methods, agriculture, etc.

Firstly, we all know Israel can't end the Hezbollah threat with military might; to repeat a phrase used by a British officer about the Taliban it's like 'punching water'.  no matter how hard you hit, it'll always ripple back.  And that's something proven right many times through history.

Just like our invasion of Jenin in 2002 didn't cause any sort of noticable plunge in terrorist acts immediately afterward, right? Yeah. :rolleyes:

And on top of that, the bombing of South Lebanon is scarcely going to dull any anger against Israel, is it?  It's only going to strengthen Hezbollah, because we've seen time and time again that bombing campaigns force populations to band together rather than demoralise; the famous 'blitz spirit', for example.  Sure, there are  other ethnic religious groups that want rid of Hezbollah - but they always did.  And all this is doing is weakening any possibility - if not already removed - for peaceful disarmament.

In case you failed to notice, we were perfectly willing to wait Southern Lebanon out for 6 years. Wait for the situation to improve, for Hezbollah to perhaps lose moral standing in Lebanon because "Hey, Israel's not in Lebanon anymore!" But nothing changed, and then they started rocketing our towns and cities. F*** that. They had a chance at peace, at normalizing the situation. They want to screw with us? They'll learn that there's a heavy price to pay.

And yes, paying that price will generate more hatred of us. More Hezbollah recruitees. More anti-Israel sentiment. We can only hope that somewhere down the line, the blind and ignorant bleeding-hearts will get slapped in the face by someone with their eyes open to what's been happening, and realize that being "nice" doesn't fracking work with the Arab mindset - especially not when when fueled by the Islamic "First the saturday people, then the sunday people" way of thinking. They want us dead. They want you dead, too. I don't plan on giving in to those desires.

ANYway.

The reason I returned to this thread was actually to post the following link - apparently this site takes the daily news from Israel, dubs it over in English, and puts it online. My parents told me about it (they've been overseas for the past month and a half), since it's been a primary way for them to watch Israeli news from overseas.

http://www.jerusalemonline.co.il/home.asp
« Last Edit: July 22, 2006, 03:38:40 pm by Sandwich »
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
So far, everything the terrorist organizations have done (Kill civilians, destroy infrastructure, assassination, Capture/kidnaping) I've seen Israel do on an even larger scale.

There's killing civillians, and there's targeting civilians. And yes, I admit that according to all reports, we killed some of those civillians we told to flee. I have no clue why that happened; I've been out of touch with local news here, so I haven't heard any explanations, mistake or otherwise. But that is one instance - an exception - up against how many suicide bombings targeted on civilians... attacks which, I might add, are not "mistakes".

Destruction of infrastructure happens in any war. We just have more weaponry. I make no apologies for Israel's destruction of bridges, etc. You want to (figuratively) cry over a bridge? Go right ahead. I'll be laughing at the bomb-wrapped terrorists standing helplessly on the other side because they can't swim. :D

-Intent is one thing, but the reality of the situation is Israel has killed far far more Lebanese while defending itself than Hezbollah has killed actually attacking Israel. A mother that watches her child die doesn't care if her child was a target or collateral damage.

And no one expects apologies for bridges but water treatment facilities, the airport, powerplants etc?

We did that. Gaza, remember? Israel's top military officers warned against it, that Gaza would become a breeding ground for terrorism, that we'd see Kassams falling on Askhelon and other cities. But we went ahead anyway, and whaddya know? It became a breeding ground for terrorism and Kassams started falling on Ashkelon and other cities. Sur-freakin-prise!

Call Gaza a trial run. We - and the rest of the world, if you'd bother to notice - saw what happens when you let them have free reign. Hell, HAMAS, the organization that had been denounced world-wide as a terrorist organization, was democratically voted into power. Hel-loooo?
- Creating a palestinian state is only part of the solution (Israel didn't even attempt helping palestinians politically organize in gaza). You seem to agree with the helping palestinians get on their feet, but have no problem with Israel dumping Palestinians in Gaza and calling it a day. They're still poor, radicalized, ripe for rebellion, and the land STILL isn't theirs. Their borders are controled by Israel and their ports are controled by Israel; its no wonder why Gaza is known as the world's largest prison. Without any sort of government, all the people that had failed them before stepped up to the plate and failed them again.

While Hamas does carry out terror operations against israel, it also provides social services plus law and order to the Palestinian people. That is what the palestinian people see and what the palestinian people voted for. While Arafat was selling his people and squandering their money, Hamas was almost the only entity that was actually trying to improve the situation for the average palestinian. Of course, when Hamas is voted into power, all anyone sees is the Palestinans voting for terrorists, they do not see the only organization that has ever seriously given a **** about Palestinans.

Agreed. But history also proves that when you strike and eliminate terrorism hotspots, such as the various explosives labs in Jenin, the attacks are reduced drastically. On the other hand, giving in to their desires (Gaza) just spawns more attacks.

-Well, by virtue of this latest flair-up, I'd have to say I really don't agree. Blowing things up might end the threat for a couple of months or years, but the violence comes right back, and just as bad as before.


 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: Israel moves tanks into Lebanon
Firstly, we all know Israel can't end the Hezbollah threat with military might; to repeat a phrase used by a British officer about the Taliban it's like 'punching water'.  no matter how hard you hit, it'll always ripple back.  And that's something proven right many times through history.

Just like our invasion of Jenin in 2002 didn't cause any sort of noticable plunge in terrorist acts immediately afterward, right? Yeah. :rolleyes:

Then why is there a war on on your doorstep?   Surely you understand the metaphor 'punching water'?  It means, they always regroup, if they have a cause.  And bombing the **** out the civillian population only reinforces that cause, not weakens it.  Hell, take it in the context it was originally used - in 2002 it looked as if the Taliban was destroyed in Afghanistan, and now they're back threatening stability.

I mean, I remember figures showing a significant dip in terrorist activities concurring with negotiations during the Oslo accords....and this doesn't show any sort of long term decreasing trend concurring around 2002; just a spike in deaths followed by a return to the norm.

And on top of that, the bombing of South Lebanon is scarcely going to dull any anger against Israel, is it?  It's only going to strengthen Hezbollah, because we've seen time and time again that bombing campaigns force populations to band together rather than demoralise; the famous 'blitz spirit', for example.  Sure, there are  other ethnic religious groups that want rid of Hezbollah - but they always did.  And all this is doing is weakening any possibility - if not already removed - for peaceful disarmament.

In case you failed to notice, we were perfectly willing to wait Southern Lebanon out for 6 years. Wait for the situation to improve, for Hezbollah to perhaps lose moral standing in Lebanon because "Hey, Israel's not in Lebanon anymore!" But nothing changed, and then they started rocketing our towns and cities. F*** that. They had a chance at peace, at normalizing the situation. They want to screw with us? They'll learn that there's a heavy price to pay.

And yes, paying that price will generate more hatred of us. More Hezbollah recruitees. More anti-Israel sentiment. We can only hope that somewhere down the line, the blind and ignorant bleeding-hearts will get slapped in the face by someone with their eyes open to what's been happening, and realize that being "nice" doesn't fracking work with the Arab mindset - especially not when when fueled by the Islamic "First the saturday people, then the sunday people" way of thinking. They want us dead. They want you dead, too. I don't plan on giving in to those desires.

So why **** over an entire country for the crimes of a few thousand nutcases?  What justifies 'turning the clock back 20 years' in response to a third party action?  If, say, a Zionist terrorist group was to emerge, kidnap some (say) Egyptians or Syrians, would that be a casus belli for a war on Israel?