Author Topic: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote  (Read 55389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline brandx0

  • 210
  • The Angriest Angel.
    • Fate of the Galaxy: The Star Wars Conversion for Freespace
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
On a larger note... any ship that goes 10 m/s is moronic too... My grandpa drives faster than that, and he's blind.

10 m/s = 22.4 mph.... for the record.

But alas, I digress

</freespace physics rant>
Former Senior Modeler, Texturer and Content Moderator (retired), Fate of the Galaxy
"I love your wrong proportions--too long, no, wait, too short
I love you with a highly symbolic torpedo up the exhaust port"
-swashmebuckle's ode to the transport

 

Offline neoterran

  • 210
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
the ships move in km/sec, not m/sec.
Official Taylor Fan Club Member.
Chief Grognard.
"How much code could a coder code if a coder could code code?"

 

Offline Mars

  • I have no originality
  • 211
  • Attempting unreasonable levels of reasonable
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
Wrong, the ships move in meters a second, otherwise you'd pass the Orion in far less than 2 seconds

 

Offline neoterran

  • 210
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
oh, you're right.
Official Taylor Fan Club Member.
Chief Grognard.
"How much code could a coder code if a coder could code code?"

 
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
Whatever engine glows get chosen one things is a must (IMHO) - they must be short. A half a mile long engine trail for a ship that moves at 10m/s is moronic to say the least..

EDIT: Taylors glows look beter to me for now..

I think most of the messing about is just with the glows, not the cones which form the 'trail'.  Big stretchy white bubbles might look cool, but they're hardly FS-ish, given the appearance of thrusters in the cutscenes.

I wouldn't complain about the ship's speeds, though: they're the only thing that keeps the game more playable than an astrogation calculation. :)

  

Offline Mars

  • I have no originality
  • 211
  • Attempting unreasonable levels of reasonable
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
oh, you're right.

Wish you were right... the whole M/S thing hurts my suspension of disbelief.

 

Offline Zacam

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • Administrator
  • 211
  • I go Sledge-O-Matic on Spammers
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • ModDB Feature
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
Why not just make it km/s? Everything will still move at the same rate it is, just update any/all speed references to title m/s as km/s.
Report MediaVP issues, now on the MediaVP Mantis! Read all about it Here!
Talk with the community on Discord
"If you can keep a level head in all this confusion, you just don't understand the situation"

¤[D+¬>

[08/01 16:53:11] <sigtau> EveningTea: I have decided that I am a 32-bit registerkin.  Pronouns are eax, ebx, ecx, edx.
[08/01 16:53:31] <EveningTea> dhauidahh
[08/01 16:53:32] <EveningTea> sak
[08/01 16:53:40] * EveningTea froths at the mouth
[08/01 16:53:40] <sigtau> i broke him, boys

 

Offline neoterran

  • 210
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
because then orions would be 1000 times longer ?
Official Taylor Fan Club Member.
Chief Grognard.
"How much code could a coder code if a coder could code code?"

 

Offline Mars

  • I have no originality
  • 211
  • Attempting unreasonable levels of reasonable
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
Quote
Why not just make it km/s? Everything will still move at the same rate it is, just update any/all speed references to title m/s as km/s.
You know that little guy in the cockpit of a Herc?

Not so little after that.

See if we make M/S to KM/S than we make M into KM, and therefore the everything will be, as neoterran said 1000 times larger.

 

Offline Commander Zane

  • 212
  • Spoot Knight of Anvils
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
Wing Commander 1 was KM/s and look how fast Hornets went... :D

 

Offline Zacam

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • Administrator
  • 211
  • I go Sledge-O-Matic on Spammers
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • ModDB Feature
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
I didn't mean internally to the engine, just cosmetically to the dispalys as appropriate for enumerating speed.
Report MediaVP issues, now on the MediaVP Mantis! Read all about it Here!
Talk with the community on Discord
"If you can keep a level head in all this confusion, you just don't understand the situation"

¤[D+¬>

[08/01 16:53:11] <sigtau> EveningTea: I have decided that I am a 32-bit registerkin.  Pronouns are eax, ebx, ecx, edx.
[08/01 16:53:31] <EveningTea> dhauidahh
[08/01 16:53:32] <EveningTea> sak
[08/01 16:53:40] * EveningTea froths at the mouth
[08/01 16:53:40] <sigtau> i broke him, boys

 

Offline Mars

  • I have no originality
  • 211
  • Attempting unreasonable levels of reasonable
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
But that still doesn't solve anything, as far as suspension of disbeleif, because the problem still exists that fighters are 20 Km long, and I don't mean the engine, I mean that's the way it would be.

 

Offline S-99

  • MC Hammer
  • 210
  • A one hit wonder, you still want to touch this.
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
What's with fighters 20km long thing?
Every pilot's goal is to rise up in the ranks and go beyond their purpose to a place of command on a very big ship. Like the colossus; to baseball bat everyone.

SMBFD

I won't use google for you.

An0n sucks my Jesus ring.

 

Offline Herra Tohtori

  • The Academic
  • 211
  • Bad command or file name
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
Relative speed increase causes equal relative increase in size.

If a fighter moves its own length ten times in a second and you say that the speed is 160 m/s or 160 km/s, there's a big difference between 16 metres long and 16 km long fighter...
There are three things that last forever: Abort, Retry, Fail - and the greatest of these is Fail.

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
On a larger note... any ship that goes 10 m/s is moronic too... My grandpa drives faster than that, and he's blind.

10 m/s = 22.4 mph.... for the record.

But alas, I digress

</freespace physics rant>

I'm not sure the ships need to move faster; after all, if they really want to shift space quickly then they simply jump out.  The rest is simply maneuvering speed.

 

Offline MetalDestroyer

  • Starwars reborn!
  • 210
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
Just increase their speed to something near to 200 m/s in normal speed and 350 m/s in top speed with afterburner.

 

Offline Slime

  • 26
  • Mucous-y
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
I still remember flying that Ulysses in Revenge... Nothing like passing by a couple of Sathan/ases/i/nazizis under 10 seconds, although dogfight missiles would become strange as you flew faster than them...

 

Offline MetalDestroyer

  • Starwars reborn!
  • 210
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
although dogfight missiles would become strange as you flew faster than them...

It's not really a problem if you modify their speed too.

 

Offline Taristin

  • Snipes
  • 213
  • BlueScalie
    • Skelkwank Shipyards
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
Wanna know why fighters in FS don't fly at 200 m/s?

Change all the ships to fly at that speed. Play a mission. Watch all of the AI kill themselves.

That's why.
Freelance Modeler | Amateur Artist

 

Offline MetalDestroyer

  • Starwars reborn!
  • 210
Re: Effects for the MV_(adv)effect VP- The vote
Wanna know why fighters in FS don't fly at 200 m/s?

Change all the ships to fly at that speed. Play a mission. Watch all of the AI kill themselves.

That's why.

I've try this, and 80% of the main Freespace 2 campaign work pretty well. However, only Bombs speed aren't modify  due to the unability to the player or to the AI ships to intercept those bombs before their impact.