Author Topic: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital  (Read 42291 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kazan

  • PCS2 Wizard
  • 212
  • Soul lives in the Mountains
    • http://alliance.sourceforge.net
The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
So, with the massive failure that the supercapital ship the Colossus turned out to be.. do you think that the GTVA would design a new class of supercapital learning from the strengths of the Sathanis or do you think they would shift toward greater firepower in a smaller package.


Personally I think that tacticians would learn not to put all their eggs in one basket and R&D would shift toward making more efficient and higher powered beam cannons, or other powerful weaponry, that could be mounted on a greater number of smaller ships (Corvette or Destroyer class) that could out maneuver the primary field of fire of a supercapital and strike at the weaknesses in it's defense.

For example - the Colossus was extremely powerful in broadside, whereas the broadside firepower of the Sath is about equivalent to that of a Demon.  Whereas we all know anything in front of a Sath is toast.


(Also of note: the BIG ASS turret on the front of the Big C that was obviously supposed to be a terrain super-beam that instead they put this tiny ass blob weapon into.. WTF)
PCS2 2.0.3 | POF CS2 wiki page | Important PCS2 Threads | PCS2 Mantis

"The Mountains are calling, and I must go" - John Muir

 

Offline Hades

  • FINISHING MODELS IS OVERRATED
  • 212
  • i wonder when my polycounts will exceed my iq
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
So, with the massive failure that the supercapital ship the Colossus turned out to be.. do you think that the GTVA would design a new class of supercapital learning from the strengths of the Sathanis or do you think they would shift toward greater firepower in a smaller package.


Personally I think that tacticians would learn not to put all their eggs in one basket and R&D would shift toward making more efficient and higher powered beam cannons, or other powerful weaponry, that could be mounted on a greater number of smaller ships (Corvette or Destroyer class) that could out maneuver the primary field of fire of a supercapital and strike at the weaknesses in it's defense.

For example - the Colossus was extremely powerful in broadside, whereas the broadside firepower of the Sath is about equivalent to that of a Demon.  Whereas we all know anything in front of a Sath is toast.


(Also of note: the BIG ASS turret on the front of the Big C that was obviously supposed to be a terrain super-beam that instead they put this tiny ass blob weapon into.. WTF)
And the Colossus doesn't have all of its turrets either.
What I would do is make a High-poly Colossus with the right amount of guns and have super beam cannons that outmatch the Sathanas. :P
[22:29] <sigtau> Hello, #hard-light?  I'm trying to tell a girl she looks really good for someone who doesn't exercise.  How do I word that non-offensively?
[22:29] <RangerKarl|AtWork> "you look like a big tasty muffin"
----
<batwota> wouldn’t that mean that it’s prepared to kiss your ass if you flank it :p
<batwota> wow
<batwota> KILL

 

Offline Kazan

  • PCS2 Wizard
  • 212
  • Soul lives in the Mountains
    • http://alliance.sourceforge.net
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
so you would think they would opt toward the better-designed supercapital
PCS2 2.0.3 | POF CS2 wiki page | Important PCS2 Threads | PCS2 Mantis

"The Mountains are calling, and I must go" - John Muir

 

Offline Polpolion

  • The sizzle, it thinks!
  • 211
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
I think they'd develop a small, efficient beam almost as powerful as a BFred, put it on a corvette, along with a healthy dose of AAA beams, flak, and a trebuchet-esque missile.

Maybe an armament of:
1x Newgreen beam
6x AAAfs
8x standard flak
4x trebuchet launchers
90k hitpoints
20 to 30 m/s speed.

Maybe a small fighterbay.

Yeah, this'd be more like a frigate. Not quite as expensive as a destroyer, quicker to produce, and fit for a wider range of roles.

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
Golgotha...destroyer sized and optimized for forward (and variable) firepower with limited fighterbay and modest broadside capabilities.  Thats my take.
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline Hades

  • FINISHING MODELS IS OVERRATED
  • 212
  • i wonder when my polycounts will exceed my iq
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
Golgotha...destroyer sized and optimized for forward (and variable) firepower with limited fighterbay and modest broadside capabilities.  Thats my take.
Figures since your the BWO Admin. :p
[22:29] <sigtau> Hello, #hard-light?  I'm trying to tell a girl she looks really good for someone who doesn't exercise.  How do I word that non-offensively?
[22:29] <RangerKarl|AtWork> "you look like a big tasty muffin"
----
<batwota> wouldn’t that mean that it’s prepared to kiss your ass if you flank it :p
<batwota> wow
<batwota> KILL

 

Offline Kazan

  • PCS2 Wizard
  • 212
  • Soul lives in the Mountains
    • http://alliance.sourceforge.net
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
Golgotha...destroyer sized and optimized for forward (and variable) firepower with limited fighterbay and modest broadside capabilities.  Thats my take.

that ship doesn't exist yet since you haven't released :P
PCS2 2.0.3 | POF CS2 wiki page | Important PCS2 Threads | PCS2 Mantis

"The Mountains are calling, and I must go" - John Muir

 

Offline Agent_Koopa

  • 28
  • These words make the page load that much slower.
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
This topic has been made before, and other people have made the point that I will now make: The Colossus was a failure at battling Sathanas juggernauts. It was not designed to battle Sathanas juggernauts. It was designed to take down a Lucifer, something it could do easily with its beam cannons. It destroyed numerous NTF warships. It nearly won the civil war, and destroyed a Sathanas mostly on its own.
Interestingly enough, this signature is none of the following:
A witty remark on whatever sad state of affairs the world may or may not be in
A series of localized forum in-jokes
A clever and self-referential comment on the nature of signatures themselves.

Hobo Queens are Crowned, but Hobo Kings are Found.

 

Offline Polpolion

  • The sizzle, it thinks!
  • 211
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
Actually what I think Kazan is asking is "Where do you think the GTVA will go next in ship designing?".

 

Offline Kazan

  • PCS2 Wizard
  • 212
  • Soul lives in the Mountains
    • http://alliance.sourceforge.net
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
Actually what I think Kazan is asking is "Where do you think the GTVA will go next in ship designing?".

 :yes:
PCS2 2.0.3 | POF CS2 wiki page | Important PCS2 Threads | PCS2 Mantis

"The Mountains are calling, and I must go" - John Muir

 

Offline Darius

  • 211
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
I'm of the opinion that anything above destroyer configuration would mostly be symbolic. In times of peace, its duties would be ceremonial; in war, it would be effective as a morale booster, even if not tactically viable.

 

Offline FUBAR-BDHR

  • Self-Propelled Trouble Magnet
  • 212
  • Master Drunk
    • 165th Beer Drinking Hell Raisers
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
Remember one thing.  There is nothing to say that the Sathanas is the big boy in the Shivan fleet.  I recall talking to a V admin in the PXO lobby one day back in the days when they were tossing around ideas for (insert forbidden 3 characters here).  The only thing he said about it when asked about Shivan planet killers was think bigger.
No-one ever listens to Zathras. Quite mad, they say. It is good that Zathras does not mind. He's even grown to like it. Oh yes. -Zathras

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
They mentioned ships so large they affected the battlefield like a planetary body, right? That bespeaks vessels so huge it seems unlikely the GTVA could produce them.

Probably Shivan, then.

 

Offline Black Wolf

  • Twisted Infinities
  • 212
  • Hey! You! Get off-a my cloud!
    • Visit the TI homepage!
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
I'm of the opinion that anything above destroyer configuration would mostly be symbolic. In times of peace, its duties would be ceremonial; in war, it would be effective as a morale booster, even if not tactically viable.

Like the Hindenberg was for the Nazis. Still, I think ceremony would have to come second when there's as clear and present danger. Personally, I see cruisers dying replaced by gunships, Corvettes powering along, destroyers splitting into carrier dominated and combat dominated (with the Hecate being the Carrier - the Orion replacement would be combat dominated) and some kind of new monitor type ships for taking out Saths. That plus RBCs becoming the tactical gods of the next few decades.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2008, 02:29:23 am by Black Wolf »
TWISTED INFINITIES · SECTORGAME· FRONTLINES
Rarely Updated P3D.
Burn the heretic who killed F2S! Burn him, burn him!!- GalEmp

 

Offline Prophet

  • 210
  • The know-it-all
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
Actually... Seeing as the only thing GTVA had edge in was fighters. Granted, they had Alpha 1. But still, if you read between the lines, GTVA pilots managed great against a numerically superior enemy.

I think bombers and smaller-than-cruiser-gunships will be tomorrows powerword. Cruiser might evolve in to agile antifighter platforms that can quickly get away from big guns. And quickly shift to block attacking bomber formations. Corvettes are the designated anticap slash multitask platform. And destroyers focus on breeding fighters ad infinitum.

Depending on how history plays out. They might have need for fighter carrying heavy hitter. For spearheading invasions and such.


However. If someone finds a way to shield capital ships... It may become apparent that fighters and bombers aren't enough. Then they'd need something to bring ****load of firepower in a short amount of time. But I won't go there since I find the idea repulsive. Like shields in general.
I'm not saying anything. I did not say anything then and I'm not saying anything now. -Dukath
I am not breaking radio silence just cos' you lot got spooked by a dead flying ****ing cow. -Sergeant Harry Wells/Dog Soldiers


Prophet is walking in the deep dark places of the earth...

 

Offline Ace

  • Truth of Babel
  • 212
    • http://www.lordofrigel.com
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
Golgotha...destroyer sized and optimized for forward (and variable) firepower with limited fighterbay and modest broadside capabilities.  Thats my take.

*IceFire is dragged away by Section Three Agents*

Admiral Kepler wishes to assure everyone that there are no 'black projects' being developed by the Alliance. Transparency is important to the GTVI.

Anyway:
One of the things Volition was talking about was "capships so big they act like the surface of a planet." If anything the Sathanas is their version of a Faustus ;)
Ace
Self-plagiarism is style.
-Alfred Hitchcock

 

Offline ShadowGorrath

  • Not funny or clever
  • 211
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
GTVA ships are fine the way they are . Kinda . They just need more powerfull reactors and something that would make their beam cannons work at a much longer range . And probably some "artillery" ships , that can fire from an extremely long range , not having to worry of the enemy reaching them in time .

However bombers are much better than capitals . Except for the fact that you'd loose a lot of them in every deployment and that they cost a lot , they can take out any capital ship .

 

Offline castor

  • 29
    • http://www.ffighters.co.uk./home/
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
I guess Shivans aren't too selective on their targets.. Maybe GTVA should produce a fleet of big dummy ships consisting mainly from solid rock, to give Sath cannons something to pound away :P

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
I guess Shivans aren't too selective on their targets.. Maybe GTVA should produce a fleet of big dummy ships consisting mainly from solid rock, to give Sath cannons something to pound away :P

QFT!

and while the Sathanases pound at teh big "dangerous" targets, the small ones chip away! :lol:
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline BlackDove

  • Star Killer
  • 211
  • Section 3 of the GTVI
    • http://www.shatteredstar.org
Re: The Great Failure: the GTVA supercapital
The solid rock targets need jump drives.