Author Topic: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?  (Read 31445 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
So...you're agreeing with me?

Partially.
While I believe that the shields are, in fact, penetrable by beams, we have canon evidence that the Lucy's shields are differ from the normal ones.

We do?

We have 'invulnerable, not merely resistant', but if the shield recharge rate (off five huge internal reactors) is simply larger than any practical damage rate, then that statement holds.

 

Offline Lucika

  • Victim of trolling-related humor
  • 211
  • Modding is l'art pour l'art
    • Syrk: The Unification Wars
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
So...you're agreeing with me?

Partially.
While I believe that the shields are, in fact, penetrable by beams, we have canon evidence that the Lucy's shields are differ from the normal ones.

We do?

We have 'invulnerable, not merely resistant', but if the shield recharge rate (off five huge internal reactors) is simply larger than any practical damage rate, then that statement holds.

"Footage suggests that the Lucifer was using a new type of shield, impervious to any of our attacks."
« Last Edit: January 31, 2010, 02:34:06 pm by Lucika »
HLP member 2008-2012 and Syrk:TUW project leader ~2010-2012

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
Sheath shielding.
However, simply having a huge ass honking standard shield generator fed by five massive reactors would be considered a new type, just because well, normal ones aren't that big!
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
So...you're agreeing with me?

Partially.
While I believe that the shields are, in fact, penetrable by beams, we have canon evidence that the Lucy's shields are differ from the normal ones.

We do?

We have 'invulnerable, not merely resistant', but if the shield recharge rate (off five huge internal reactors) is simply larger than any practical damage rate, then that statement holds.

"Footage suggests that the Lucifer was using a new type of shield, impervious to any of our attacks."

Again, completely compatible with what I just said.

 

Offline Lucika

  • Victim of trolling-related humor
  • 211
  • Modding is l'art pour l'art
    • Syrk: The Unification Wars
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
So...you're agreeing with me?

Partially.
While I believe that the shields are, in fact, penetrable by beams, we have canon evidence that the Lucy's shields are differ from the normal ones.

We do?

We have 'invulnerable, not merely resistant', but if the shield recharge rate (off five huge internal reactors) is simply larger than any practical damage rate, then that statement holds.

"Footage suggests that the Lucifer was using a new type of shield, impervious to any of our attacks."

Again, completely compatible with what I just said.

Is it?

I've said that is a new type of shield while you've said that it is only a bigger and better version of the normal ones.
HLP member 2008-2012 and Syrk:TUW project leader ~2010-2012

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
A bigger and better version of the smaller shields qualifies as a new type of shield.

For example, a bigger and better version of a cruiser is called a corvette, not a cruiser, quiaff?

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
So...you're agreeing with me?

Partially.
While I believe that the shields are, in fact, penetrable by beams, we have canon evidence that the Lucy's shields are differ from the normal ones.

We do?

We have 'invulnerable, not merely resistant', but if the shield recharge rate (off five huge internal reactors) is simply larger than any practical damage rate, then that statement holds.

"Footage suggests that the Lucifer was using a new type of shield, impervious to any of our attacks."

Again, completely compatible with what I just said.

Is it?

I've said that is a new type of shield while you've said that it is only a bigger and better version of the normal ones.

And, again, my statement is not contradicted by anything you've cited.

And a big aff to Scotty.

  

Offline castor

  • 29
    • http://www.ffighters.co.uk./home/
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
Why did the shivans shield the lucifer and didn't shield the sathanas which is much bigger and supposed to be stronger? And why didn't the shivans use any Lucifer destroyers in FS2?
Maybe their ships are mostly intended to be operated in subspace. Maybe "normal" space is only marginally relevant for their plans.

 

Offline High Max

  • Permanently banned
  • 29
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
I go by the fact that anti-fighter beams damage your hull and bypass your shields completely. Do they do damage to shields in retail? I can't remember for sure. So certain shields may be merely resistant or impervious to normal weapons, but beams don't seem to apply to this restriction since they seem to completely bypass shields for smaller craft, so it makes sense for bigger beams to be able to completely bypass capship shields too, right?

Maybe the Lucifer had shields because the Shivans never expect other races to have beams like they do. It is intended to repel normal energy weapons and mass weapons, so it is still added protection from bombers and other weaponry, even if other species have beams, and it would take longer to destroy it since only beams might pierce it.

As for my assumptions in my earlier post: I go by the most likely assumption based on the story line and tech description of the Shivans and what I think makes sense. If it wasn't true, then why would Volition say 'hive' in the tech database? Just to make you wonder or just for kicks? Did it say 'could be' and then list other possibilities? The tech database said 'most likely' constructed by another entity too, and I like that idea, since it said 'most likely'. I don't think V would say it unless it had meaning to the story if it is being said in the tech database.

If they are from subspace and constructed by another entity in real space, maybe this other entity put subspace beings in machine bodies and this particular subspace (beings) are conscious, like spirits, or in scientific terms that seem close to the same thing, energy beings that can control bodies. So maybe we are fighting subspace itself but in the form of physical Shivans, 'shells' for these subspace beings that let them interact in real space in order to protect subspace from real space beings.

@Matt: In English, we also use words like 'maybe' or 'probably' or 'might' to express opinions, and I have done that in many cases throughout the board.
;-)   #.#   *_*   ^^   ^-^   ^_^

 

Offline Timerlane

  • 27
  • Overseer of Slag Determination
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
As I believe also comes up fairly often during these threads:
Quote
Unlike the shields on the Shivan fighters and bombers, this shield appears impervious, not merely resistant, to all of our weapons.
And that nothing the GTA had at the time would likely have had enough anti-shield power to appear to make a dent in a super-strength shield.

Tsunamis and Harbingers have horrid multipliers vs shields; maybe if all the Hercs I in the fleet were present, and equipped with Banshees, there could be some effect.

If it were ever explicitly stated in canon that even capital ship kamikaze attacks(ala ST:R/Derelict) were tried on the Lucifer to still no effect, I would more than likely have believe otherwise, but as things are, I don't see how it could not simply be explained away by a very high number of shield hitpoints, plus recharge from up to five (presumably)destroyer-class reactors.

 
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
It is stated that Lucy's shields are "impervious" to plasma and kinetic weapons. i am working under the assumption of an Orion-class destroyer ramming into Lucy is a Kinetic attack

 

Offline S-99

  • MC Hammer
  • 210
  • A one hit wonder, you still want to touch this.
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
Others say that there are other Lucifer-class destroyers out there, but were withdrawn from the Shivan fleet and mothballed after the destruction of this one.
This fan theory made me laugh (and hurt my brain). And i know it's not your theory androgeus, you were just mentioning some fan theories.

Shivan1: Oh we made thousands of these super destroyers and they're really great at what they do!
Shivan2: But one of them got destroyed.
Shivan1: You're right. We ****ed up. Time to pull them off the front lines for good.

Seriously, one of them barely gets destroyed in a co-species last ditch effort to save earth. And the shivans conclusion is that since one of the lucifer class ships gets destroyed, that they should mothball every single one of these highly effective ships.

Through this logic in fs2, we shouldn't have seen 80 extra sathani after the first one barely got destroyed in a co-species effort. After the first sathanus got destroyed, the shivans should have been pulling all of these ships off the front lines and mothball every singe one of these highly effective ships.

What a stupid theory :lol:
Every pilot's goal is to rise up in the ranks and go beyond their purpose to a place of command on a very big ship. Like the colossus; to baseball bat everyone.

SMBFD

I won't use google for you.

An0n sucks my Jesus ring.

 

Offline High Max

  • Permanently banned
  • 29
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
I agree.
;-)   #.#   *_*   ^^   ^-^   ^_^

 

Offline Stormkeeper

  • Interviewer Extraordinaire
  • 211
  • Boomz!
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
*snip*
By extension the entire Shivan armada shoulda been pulled from the frontlines, and we should've been facing a new ship every battle!

It would be much more reasonable to think that the Lucifer was merely a ship with a prototype sheath shielding system, and the prototype was lost with it.
Ancient-Shivan War|Interview Board

Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 

Offline Desertfox287

  • 27
  • Sweat saves blood-Erwin Rommel
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
*snip*
By extension the entire Shivan armada shoulda been pulled from the frontlines, and we should've been facing a new ship every battle!

It would be much more reasonable to think that the Lucifer was merely a ship with a prototype sheath shielding system, and the prototype was lost with it.
If it was a prototype, wouldn't they still have schematics for it?

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
Cost, economy, money, is all a human concept because humans don't think like a hive.

Certain economic principles are universal. There will always be cost, in time and resources, and opportunity cost, in that you could have been using said time and resources for other things, regardless of your society's structuring.

Seriously, one of them barely gets destroyed in a co-species last ditch effort to save earth. And the shivans conclusion is that since one of the lucifer class ships gets destroyed, that they should mothball every single one of these highly effective ships.

Destroyed, and blows up the node, and takes critical command staff or C3I equipment with it, and...you get the idea. If the whole point of the design was to centralize certain things on a platform that could not be destroyed, and the design failed in action badly enough, sure, they'll withdraw it. The Lucifer after all went down to 16 fighters (which, from the FS1 endgame cutscene, none of which were lost!). It deployed as much as several times that number in its own defense, and it may not have even suffered significant hull damage in the process of its own destruction. Something was fundementally unsound here.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
I'm sure the Shivans could build as many Lucifers as they wanted in the FS2 era. They'd just be worthless: armed with two SReds and no longer invincible.

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
They still have a lot of HP, whatever that counts for.
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline Stormkeeper

  • Interviewer Extraordinaire
  • 211
  • Boomz!
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
And lets not mention the sheer morale damage.
Ancient-Shivan War|Interview Board

Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Shivan Super-Ships Shields?
I'm sure the Shivans could build as many Lucifers as they wanted in the FS2 era. They'd just be worthless: armed with two SReds and no longer invincible.
I don't really take that FS2 Lucifer loadout to be canon, or at least particularly strong canon, seeing as how Lucifer-class ships never made an appearance in FS2 proper.  It smacks more of someone at :v: throwing it into the tables and loading it out with pre-existing FS2 weapons.