Oh, Xaser weapons are considered as plasma in BP? That's interesting. I don't think I can look at the Subach the same now...for the Slammer, I guess they just...well, tossed more explosives or something into it. For me, I think swarm as a technology is plausible, you'd have to do a lot of research on it, so the warheads don't hit each other or something and require intense synchronization, something that should be out of the norms for any 'normal' missile/bomb technology. I personally don't use the Circe and Lampreys myself unless I'm bored or have three banks. Limited utility, but I believe it's playstyle. Although I admit, classifying the Maxim as a firearm is...hilarious. I guess tactical doctrine is a better word than classifying it as a class of technology, yeah.
--------------
Dragon:
Well...I'm not referring to the effects of the technlogy, just what they're classified under. Hornets, Tornadoes, that swarm bomb, they're all swarm weaponry. Slammers and Infyrnos are high explosive, anti-fighter/bomber screen weapons or something like that...I'd forget about the Piranha anyway. Under electromagnetic weapons, electromagnetism used to propel things, and electromagnetic pulses to mess with people's cockpits, are still electromagnetic. It's simple classification, like bullets are bullets, bombs are bombs, rockets are rockets and missiles are missiles (be it nuclear missiles, anti-tank guided missiles, air-to-ground missiles, etc.). Going into subclasses of weaponry is an entirely different matter, like EMP missiles to railguns and stuff.
Although I still don't know what the Rapier is classified as besides as an energy weapon, actually. The Gattler does have more ROF and damage IIRC, but being ammo-bound is kinda sucky...especially when we're Morning Staring the topic.