Author Topic: bobbtmann's Version, still in existence. (Read 31424 times)

Venicius · **Reply #80 on:** April 29, 2011, 11:28:04 am

That's amazing! I want this one soooo much! Keep up the fantastic job!

Nyctaeus · **Reply #81 on:** April 29, 2011, 11:57:34 am

Stunning!

I have a suggestion. Please, keep the textures similar to standard ones. For me, textures of Rga's Sath are too different from orginal ones.

Nohiki · **Reply #82 on:** April 30, 2011, 12:25:50 am

uhh... IMHO the paint job doesn't look shivan at all. It's line-y, shivan ships should be swirly

Mars · **Reply #83 on:** April 30, 2011, 01:38:39 am

The glowmap looks FS1 Shivanesqe

CommanderDJ · **Reply #84 on:** April 30, 2011, 01:50:15 am

Quote from: Mars on April 30, 2011, 01:38:39 am

The glowmap looks FS1 Shivanesqe

Yeah, it hearkens back to those fond days where Shivans ships had simple paintjobs/textures.

To make some general comments, I like the simplistic style of this Sath. It's consistent, ragged, scaly, and like others have mentioned, looks a lot more evil. Whilst Rga's says "Get near me and I will **** you up with my uber lazorz and flax and sup3rnova cannonz", this one is more "Get near me, and you'll regret it. I won't tell you what I'll do, but you're not going to like it". It looks menacing without looking like it bristles with firepower (even though it does). Just keep doing what you're doing, bobbtmann. I know it'll turn out brilliant.

Trivial Psychic · **Reply #85 on:** April 30, 2011, 08:01:29 am

Quote from: Mars on April 30, 2011, 01:38:39 am

The glowmap looks FS1 Shivanesqe

Hmmm... campaign ideas....

Rampage · **Reply #86 on:** April 30, 2011, 08:51:49 am

Great work BTW; nice counterpart to RNorris' work.

BTW can you change the spelling of this thread's title? "Existance" should be spelled "existence".

-R

The E · **Reply #87 on:** April 30, 2011, 08:53:46 am

Nope.

bobbtmann · **Reply #88 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:12:27 am

Well that's embarrassing. So it isn't possible to change the spelling?

Nohiki, so you mean swirly like this? The original texture is in the new one. It's just more subdued.

[attachment deleted by ninja]

Veers · **Reply #89 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:15:32 am

Well, I do like that swirl you have there... very nice.

jr2 · **Reply #90 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:17:10 am

@bobbtmann: You can change the spelling by hitting "Preview" in quick reply (so you get full reply window) and changing the title.

EDIT: That's IIRC. And I think you have to do it. All the other posts will still stay the same, but the thread title and any new posts will change.

The E · **Reply #91 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:21:39 am

jr2, check your dictionary. "Existance" is a perfectly valid word to use.

bobbtmann · **Reply #92 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:25:51 am

I don't know, E. It doesn't look right, and it's not in my dictionary...

edit: It doesn't seem to work jr2, all it changes is the title of my single post.

jr2 · **Reply #93 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:26:37 am

I didn't even mentally check the word or look it up. I was too busy answering his question. Although I do remember a split second of feeling puzzled when I read his question before I proceeded to switch to problem-solving mode.

EDIT: Google says "do you mean existence", but then proceeds to give me definitions for existance. (Which HLP's or Google Chrome's spellchecker, IDK which, says is not a word cause it's underlined in red.)
EDIT2: Which, the definitions for existence are all either saying it's a common misspelling or a completely different definition than the one called for.

General Battuta · **Reply #94 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:27:26 am

I think it should be existence, unless this is a Brit spelling thing I'm unaware of.

TopAce · **Reply #95 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:29:11 am

Quote from: The E on April 30, 2011, 09:21:39 am

jr2, check your dictionary. "Existance" is a perfectly valid word to use.

Check yours first.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/existance
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/existance

The E · **Reply #96 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:29:57 am

Huh. Ok. I'm wrong.

Sorry.

MatthTheGeek · **Reply #97 on:** April 30, 2011, 10:03:24 am

Even the French spelling for it is "existence". Yay for transparent words.

Raiden · **Reply #98 on:** April 30, 2011, 07:23:26 pm

Wow, I'm really, really liking this version a lot. Imagine seeing that floating through space, you'd piss in your space pants.

Zacam · **Reply #99 on:** April 30, 2011, 09:46:41 pm

Applied spelling correction to main Topic. Already made replies will still carry the old spelling however.

News:

Author Topic: bobbtmann's Version, still in existence. (Read 31424 times)

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Spaghettios

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existence.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existence.