Originally posted by SadisticSid
No doubt they'll butcher the story's christian attributes to make it more 'compatible' with other faiths. What Stunaep said, basically.
I don't know, Sid. If one were to leave the story word for word intact and make no mention of God or the crucifiction, most people most likely wouldn't notice. I for one completely missed the biblical themes during my first three readings. It didn't help that I read the books in chronological, rather than canonical, order. As a result, I saw Aslan creating Narnia. That doesn't match well with Christian dogma, since Aslan represents the Christ, not the Father (consistently, Aslan always refers to his 'Father across/beyond the Sea', indicating His place in the world).
You might, however, run into some issues with the later books (The Horse and His Boy, The Last Battle). It would be very easy to find ethnocentric and religiocentric bigotry in Lewis' writings, with regard to the Calormene. Its not a far step to associate Tash with Allah. Of course, to do so would be most assuredly contrary to Lewis' intentions. Despite the middle-eastern depictions of the Calormene, Tash is surely intended to represent a Satan figure, rather than Allah. This is, of course, highlighted in Aslan's words to the Calormene soldier (something like, "whomever does good works in the name of Tash, is doing My work").
I think I remember all of that rightly. Calormene might be the wrong word, but I'm pretty sure that Tash is the evil god figure.