[Bobboau]

Originally posted by Liberator
Rictor, what you don't understand is that until recently, Christianity has been turning the other cheekso now they have turned there backs on the teachings of Chist, well what a wonderfull reason to follow them .  It's just that Robertson & Co. counterparts on the otherside have raised the stakes with gay marriage and a myriad of other blasphemies that we can't just sit idly by while our way of life _your_ way of life?  is changed for the worse.  Homosexuality is a sin in every major religion on Earth.  By allowing Gays to marry, we will have allowed, through inaction, an inexcusable blasphemy against God. becase it's your job to make sure people don't use there 'God given' free will to chose between right and wrong

Tolerance and peace are noble goals. too bad they're not yours  But don't shake a man's hand if he has a knife in the other one.  The people who support gay marriage ultimately also support the complete obliteration of Christianity, Judaism and every other form of organized religion on Earth, becase you know what I want more than I do because they suffer from a delusion that by killing the messengers they can kill the message and thanks for telling me what my motivation is  that their behaviors are wrong, no matter how right it feels and thanks for judegeing me, but your doing all the rest of Gods jobs I'm sure he has no problem with you takeing on one more , and that they'll then be able to get away with whatever they want oh, the horror, we'll have the freedom to live our lifes the way we want ITSTHE END OF CIVILISEATION!!! .  It won't be like that, someone will always stand for what is right in this world take that you fucking fags, despite the oppositions best efforts. yeah, know your role and shut your mouth we know better

[Bobboau]

Rictor I'll have you know I copied and pasted that from the HOLY BIBLE, it would be a Blasphomy against God ALMIGHTY to correct his devine typos.

...sinner!

[Rictor]

c'mon lay off him for a bit. Yeah yeah, you don't agree and neither do I, but we've been through this already. No one is going to change anyone's mind. He's free to believe what he wants, as is everyone else.

[aldo_14]

DEUTERONOMY  22:8 When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a battlement for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thine house, if any man fall from thence.

Does your house have a battlement?  Does it?! SINNER!!!!














hehe.

also; 22:10 Thou shalt not plow with an ox and an ass together.

I can see some of this stuff really threatens the future of mankind.

EDIT; yeah Rictor, fair point.  

Let's not make personal attacks here, I'll try and stick to describing my precise objections & views from now on if I haven't already.

[Clave]

The mere fact that the argument is taking place, disproves the existance, and therefore, laws, of God.  It's all about proof, and intervention.  If God were to appear right now, then the argument would be over, and everyone like me could say "Oh crap! I was wrong all along" and wail and gnash our teeth etc.  

BUT IT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN! get over it, and stop using your redundant book to berate people about thier private lives - butt out! (literally and metorphorically) the Law is made by the people, not some bearded fool in the sky.

Oh, and Christians are tolerant and accepting? - Tell that to thousands hacked down by the Crusaders in the 'Holy Land'

OK, who else can I turn on today?

Jews - See above, whatever you think is wrong.  Bacon is delicious, your multitude of laws make no sense, mutilating young boys is NOT right.

Hindus - What's with the cows?

Sikhs - What's with the hair? it's NOT sacred, any more than my armpit.

Buddists - Your god is a fat bloke that sits on his arse all day? might as well worship a football fan.

Shinto - I just don't want to know how much crack you smoked before leading a procession through streets carrying a giant penis on a platform

Catholics - Nuns are the most evil, spiteful, and hate-filled creatures to stalk the earth

(As you may have guessed, I'm in a bad mood today)

[aldo_14]

Originally posted by Clave

(As you may have guessed, I'm in a bad mood today)

No ****, sherlock?

[Clave]

Actually, you just cheered me up a little, thanks!

[Ghostavo]

And buddists have no god...

[Bobboau]

yeah he was just th first guy to 'win'

[Clave]

Oh well, this thread is more 'emotive' than 'factual' anyways....

[Janos]

buy hay guyz evolution is just a theory it doenst even have th big bang everywear in it i mean then it just cant be rite am i rite

[Black Wolf]

I have no idea if you're being sarcastic or not...

[Stealth]

Originally posted by aldo_14
DEUTERONOMY  22:8 When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a battlement for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thine house, if any man fall from thence.

Does your house have a battlement?  Does it?! SINNER!!!!

Funny enough, what that was talking about was at the time many of the houses had flat roofs, and the family, guests, etc. would often gather on the roof to eat, talk, etc.  but since there was just a straight drop, it was saying that if someone were to fall over, because you didn't have any protection around the roof, then you'd be bloodguilty.

and the reason Christians believe homosexual is a sin, is because of the numerous references to it in the Bible, all of which condemn it.

EDIT:  also, i'm not trying to start anything, but didn't Darwin later turn on his theory and say it was inaccurate?  or am i thinking of someone else... i might be thinking of someone else, i know SOMEONE did that though

[aldo_14]

Originally posted by Stealth


Funny enough, what that was talking about was at the time many of the houses had flat roofs, and the family, guests, etc. would often gather on the roof to eat, talk, etc.  but since there was just a straight drop, it was saying that if someone were to fall over, because you didn't have any protection around the roof, then you'd be bloodguilty.

and the reason Christians believe homosexual is a sin, is because of the numerous references to it in the Bible, all of which condemn it.

EDIT:  also, i'm not trying to start anything, but didn't Darwin later turn on his theory and say it was inaccurate?  or am i thinking of someone else... i might be thinking of someone else, i know SOMEONE did that though

I don't believe he did, no.  I believe there was a faked claim he had 'recanted' his scientific theories on his deathbed.

He did say, IIRC, that in human society 'survival of the fittest' had become somewhat inversed, as the first to die in war are usually the best men - at the front.  I think he (Darwin) detested the use of 'social Darwinism', etc, to justify discrimination against the weaker members of society.

[Black Wolf]

Originally posted by Stealth

EDIT:  also, i'm not trying to start anything, but didn't Darwin later turn on his theory and say it was inaccurate?

You're thinking of Darwin, but the story is actually bull****. Besides - even if he had recanted, it doesn't make the theory any less correct.

Check out here for a slightly extended version. That site also owns for answering the vast majority of anti-evolution arguments thrown up in this thread. I sugest everybody (Creationists and Evolutionists alike) read through the list before (continuing) debating evolution/creationism.

[aldo_14]

The theory was also formed by another man, something Wallace, wasn't it?  The 2 of them co-wrote the first paper on the theory IIRC - I think the main difference was that Wallace though natural selection was constant, whereas Darwin thought it occured more or less only when the environment changed.

[Styxx]

Originally posted by Stealth
EDIT:  also, i'm not trying to start anything, but didn't Darwin later turn on his theory and say it was inaccurate?  or am i thinking of someone else... i might be thinking of someone else, i know SOMEONE did that though

I think he mentioned something about the sheer complexity of the human eye as striking him as impossible to achieve through his own theory, but I don't know if he was actually serious. There's a well documented evolution path for the human eye, from simple photosensitive cells on the first complex organisms to its current structure on humans, so any doubts raised by it at the time have long since been dismissed.

[an0n]

He wasn't retracting his claims, he was marvelling at the complexity of it all.

[Styxx]

Originally posted by an0n
He wasn't retracting his claims, he was marvelling at the complexity of it all.

Yeah, more or less what I figured.

[Stealth]

ooohk.  i knew i'd heard something about that, didn't know the specifics... thanks for briefing me

"Social Darwinism" is the biggest load of crap... one of the reasons i dropped college Sociology.  Sociology makes absolutely no sense tome