Actually, Sandwich, if the Dutch muslim population ever became a majority and we got a PM named Ali, I'd be just has happy has I was now. (Meaning, pretty damned annoyed. Right now we've got a Christian Democrat (the name is odd, but conservative, somewhat right-wing religious party) and honestly, he's a bad PM. I don't care what religion someone has, I care about his views on economics and social stance. A progressive muslim PM would be a LOT better then a conservative Christian one, IMO.)
Before I say anything else, I would like to point out anything I say in this thread is for the sake of the argument, and in no means personally against anyone. If our opinions deferr, that doesn't matter for my personal view of anyone in here. I hope the others feel the same.
Honestly, the first thing I hate is the 'we were here first' argument, simply because it creates so many issues. No-one should be punished for what his or her great-grandfather did. No-one should automtically get any rights from what his or her ancestors did either.
As for a muslim takeover anywhere: Every vote counts as one, and only as one. That's a prime point of a democracy. If a majority decides that they want a Muslim PM, who am I to argue in any other way then a democratic one. If you disagree, create an opposing party and run in the elections for parliament.
About Isrealian opression: The violence has to stop on both sides, so one side will simply have to be the first to show a true dedication to lasting peace. If older attempts for peace failed, the process will simply have to be forced through somehow. Israel makes the process harder by not allowing the Palestinians souvereignity.
I would like to point out I don't see the connection between the bombings and this discussion, though. If a Christian fringe group commited the bombing, would we be discussing a Christian complot?