Well i dont know about that aldo i mean i'm NOT sayng that you are wrong its just that at this rate the GTVA will never ever be able to win any srious battle against the shivans. Sure the whole technological peak regarding the shivans is debatable since there is no cannon proof to sugest that but then agains there is indirect proof of the shivans very slow technological advances over the course of several thousands of years. I mean look at it we have the same cruisers and fighter/bommbers deployed by the shivans when engaging the GTVA both in FS1 and in FS2 that they ued against the Ancients.
Well that's a completely unfounded guess right there......the only single mention of the Shivan forces that destroyed the Ancients is a) that they had a shielded destroyer class the Ancients could not destroy and b) something with Lucifer-esque weaponry destroyed Altair. The most you can map that to is the use of a/the Lucifer.
Of course that is also debatable since there is no clear evidence to sugest that these are actual designs used by the shivans several thousands of years ago. But there are a lot of indirect evidence to supot it. Also i believe that the Lucifer was the same ship that spearheaded the shivan destruction of the ancients or a ship similar to it.(same class i mean).
That's not actually evidence for technological stagnation, unless you want to suggest the Shivans developed beams, flak, and a supernova-causing juggernaut fleet in the time period between FS1 and FS2 (in which case they clearly have a greater capacity for advancement and manufacturing).
Also we must remember something that we have seen over the course of history whenever a society becomes too owerfull it begins to stagnate. technological breakthrougs are made at a much wider period of time just because they have the upper hand regardless of theyr technological superiority or not.
What, like the US?
We must remember that the Ancients could in act have been just as advanced as the shivas in terms of waepons technologi except for the whole Lucifer shileds.(this is by no mean cannon but speculation). And in terms of subspace technologi there is definetly proof of the ancients vast knoldge and technological skills regarding this aspect. It would be safe to asume that maibe theyr tech rivaled that of the shivans(subsapce tech that is).
Safe? I doubt that any assumptions regarding the Shivans and Ancients would be safe. Based on how you read the monologues, it's actually debatable whether the ancients took down a
single shivan ship of any sort, even though I'd wager they had.
Of course, the other side is that the Ancients were more advanced than humanity; after all, it was their subspace tracking device that won the Great War, otherwise the GT(V)A was simply mincemeat. Quite why or where the Ancients figure in this little chain of reasoning, I don't know. After all, they were verifiably far more advanced than the GTVA (Knossos device, subspace tracking), but were annihilated by a Shivan fleet that may have been of the archaic specifications of the FS1 fleet.
You can argue, of course, that the victory in FS1 shown a human ability to adapt alien technology to survive; but that can't apply to the Shivans unless we've seen all their tricks, and I doubt we have.
We all know thet the only thing that tipped the balance of power in favor of the shivans was the fact that the ancients could not get past the Lucifer's shields in time. And since we have cannon proof somewhere cant remember where exactly that the Ancients were only decades ahead of the GTVA in terms of ship/weapons tech it is safe to asume that the GTVA through a concentrated effort could in fact given some time equal the shivans in terms of ship/weapons tech. Subspace travell well thats something else but nothing is imposible as the FS universe tought us.
We have absolutely no canon proof of the Ancients shield or weapons tech levels, let alone the relative difference between it and GTVA levels. It has never been mentioned anywhere within FS. Unless you can correct me with a source, of course.
In any case, all it means it that the GTVA has xx years to catch up with the Ancients, a race annihilated by the Shivans 8000 years ago.
If the Shivans were changing their technology every 50 years, would they have enough time to make the numbers of ships they apparently have?
Why not?
What is jump option 3?
I woud figure that as long as supernova's are starting up, and ships are warping out, that the shivans must have had a way to escape.
In reality aldo they could have gone anywhere, and where is what we don't know.
Option 3; jump 'into' the nova. I mean, it
is a subspace distortion effect going on there, and we can't assume the nova wasn't a minor sideffect of doing something far more important to the Shivans.
(there's another option that springs to mind, that the Shivans jumped into subspace and waited within there, although I don't even know if that's possible)
I'm going to have call BS on the Shivans having vastly superior technology then the GTVA, 'cuz frankly it's pretty obvious they don't. In a lot of areas the Shivans are starting to lag badly by FS2. Their fightercraft are poor; their defenses against fighters laughable. Shivan beams are marginally superior (and the GTVA did build the Mjolnir, which beats everything but the BFRed, so their superiority of technology is dubious; it may simply be that the Shivans don't need as much in the way of heatsinks to keep their ships' environment bearable), but the ships that wield them display no great superiority of technology. The Shivan advantage is largely one of aggressor's initative and tactics/equipment optimized for it, not technology.
Are we talking the gameplay stats or the tech/cb/message brieifings here? Because i'm pretty sure the latter gives the Shivans a big upper hand, and I'd hold that over the stats simply because it's not much fun placing the player against a large number of invincible opponents.
I've also noted before that it seems as though the Shivans overinvested in those 80+ Sathanii. Shivan destroyers and corvettes are vastly underrepresented in the main campaign. For the destroyers in particular the same names keep being used, as though they don't have many of them. GTVA fighters have advanced by leaps and bounds; Shivan ones have made less impressive gains. The same can be said of capital craft.
And finally, there is the second option on the origin of the star-nuker: that it is Ancients, not Shivan, technology.
It doesn't strike me as a very good option, because I can't see a single use in nuking a star for the Ancients. There's not much point building an empire if you destroy all your possesions in doing so. Granted, I guess you
could suggest that it was useful for creating mining fields of gas (NB: how long does a supernova take to cool down to a nebula?), but that strikes me as equivalent to nuking Chicago just so you can get some glass. There's definately not any evidence so far AFAIK for them using it against the Shivans (which would strike me as the most obvious deployment, if they couldn't seal a node any other way), because the only nebula in FS2 has a Knossos indicating post-exploration.
Moreso, I can't really see the Shivans as a goa'uld type scavenger race. It just doesn't sit with the 'invincible enemy' image for me.