No, it means that he doesn't understand reason and his arguments are flawed/contradicting, and there's no point arguing.
If you define reason as "being totally ignorant and blind" then no, I don't understand it.
I have to agree. He's unintentionally hilarious -- he throws out nonsensical arguments and then ridicules other, better-constructed reasoning. Because he's not aware of the flaws in his own reasoning, he's convinced everyone else is a nut.
I can say the same thing about you.
There has always been a clash between religious people and religion haters on these forums. Unfortunately for me I'm outnumbered here.
We can agree that you won't convince me and I won't convince you.
You are convinced that you follow reason and your arguments are superior, while I don't have any arguments to speak of.
Well, it goes vice-versa too. I'm just as convinced about my being right as you are about you being right.
I consider your arguments ill-constructed, your reasoning flawed and while I don't consider you "nuts", I certanly consider you blind. Make of that what you will.
Now all you religion-haters give yourself a nice pat on the back and start making fun of me. I would consider doing the same among my own group, but I don't have a habit of demonizing non-believers, and I'm not about to start now.
God bless you all.
