Author Topic: Transcend dumb mission  (Read 5541 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline technopredator

  • Does not compute
  • 27
  • Don't get mad, consequences are revenging you.
Transcend dumb mission
you have to fight 4:1, fighters with more manoeuvrability than you, because the impossible to kill dumbasses of your wingmen are distracting 2 cruiser all by themselves, because they're in GOd mode and they can't die but won't help you at all. You can't change weapons or armour of course so you're pretty ****ed up; best you can do is get about 3K away from the cruisers so they don't flak you to death. so unless you're really good at mouse fighting I can't pass this mission in hard setting, maybe uber pilots can pass this in insane yeah maybe 5 in the world, this is why I think is dumb. Oh and the campaign won't let you give them orders or reload weapons even when you have a friendly cruiser travelling with you.

And one feature I think really sucks in this game is that AI pilot never miss, that really stupid they should have random individual accuracy rating for each AI pilot and within that rate a random accuracy sub-range, to give the impression of realism.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2011, 10:12:48 pm by technopredator »

 
Re: Transcend dumb mission
Quote from: your profile
Don't get mad, consequences are revenging you.

Hey, the mission isn't that bad. That one in the SOC loop where it's you against a million hercs is worse. If the game is hard try playing on medium or easy.

And the AI targeting does work pretty much as you described. The first few shots have random inaccuracy while the AI gets a "fix" on you and then becomes more accurate. So the solution is to keep hitting TAB and jink periodically to prevent the AI from getting a long burst off at you.

 

Offline Shivan Hunter

  • 210
  • FRED needs lambdas!
Re: Transcend dumb mission
Avoid the beam and you won't get hit, pilot

 

Offline Herra Tohtori

  • The Academic
  • 211
  • Bad command or file name
Re: Transcend dumb mission
Transcend gameplay is just there to transition you from one incredible brain**** **** brix moment to another. If you're failing in it, just turn down the difficulty and enjoy the actual point of the campaign.

Torturing yourself by running at higher than comfortable difficulty setting on a completely story-driven campaign seems pointless to me. Is there some inherent value in completing mission X of campaign Y at difficulty Z, when all difficulty settings lead to same end result?
There are three things that last forever: Abort, Retry, Fail - and the greatest of these is Fail.

 

Offline technopredator

  • Does not compute
  • 27
  • Don't get mad, consequences are revenging you.
Re: Transcend dumb mission
Transcend gameplay is just there to transition you from one incredible brain**** **** brix moment to another. If you're failing in it, just turn down the difficulty and enjoy the actual point of the campaign.

Torturing yourself by running at higher than comfortable difficulty setting on a completely story-driven campaign seems pointless to me. Is there some inherent value in completing mission X of campaign Y at difficulty Z, when all difficulty settings lead to same end result?
Yes, realism.

Looks like I'm gonna have to turn down the difficulty for this one, because is really hard to stay away from 4 fighters outmanoeuvring you and chaff missiles all the time, they pretty much change direction really unrealistically fast, and the same when they have finally fixed you and fire you really god even if you TAB and 'Z' and turn like a madman , even fire shots at them and your wingmen, playing God with the cruisers take forever to call for help; really poor mission design.

I'd have liked better several wings of fighters, against the whole formation with support ship realoading you periodically, but well, is just a game and is just a mission I can skip or play it in medium/easy.

Cheers.

PS the motto only works in real life, not in a game

 

Offline Sushi

  • Art Critic
  • 211
Re: Transcend dumb mission
Realism kinda goes out the window with Transcend anyway, unless you believe in magically self-rearming and self-repairing fighters. Just go with it. :)

 

Offline technopredator

  • Does not compute
  • 27
  • Don't get mad, consequences are revenging you.
Re: Transcend dumb mission
Realism kinda goes out the window with Transcend anyway, unless you believe in magically self-rearming and self-repairing fighters. Just go with it. :)
True but is nto excuse to try to improve it as much as you can. It would be more realistic if you could have a cruiser of some kind with your form and a finite number of support ships coming from that cruiser, but I think that is not possible in this game.

 

Offline Wobble73

  • 210
  • Reality is for people with no imagination
    • Steam
Re: Transcend dumb mission
  :wtf:  Turning up the difficulty doesn't make the game any more real, just makes it more difficult!  :nervous:
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
 
Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 You would be well adviced to question the wisdom of older forumites, we all have our preferences and perversions

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Transcend dumb mission
And one feature I think really sucks in this game is that AI pilot never miss, that really stupid they should have random individual accuracy rating for each AI pilot and within that rate a random accuracy sub-range, to give the impression of realism.

That's exactly how the game works. Ships have AI classes with individual accuracy ratings.

 

Offline Thaeris

  • Can take his lumps
  • 211
  • Away in Limbo
Re: Transcend dumb mission
Transcend does 4/6-on-one dogfights a lot. A LOT. Playing on medium difficulty was still a handful in this campaign for me, and the weapons that are given to you are just a kick in the teeth for dogfights, with the exception of the Harpoons. Even then, getting an aspect lock on a Perseus close in is a tough one...

...I'll maintain that the Herc II is good for most any role imaginable, but your "elite, but amazingly inept" comrades as well as your awful loadout (what I wouldn't do for a bank of Tempests...) makes for a nasty time. Turning down the difficulty, as others have suggested, is not a bad call. I beat Transcend on Medium all the way through, but I died very often in the big, open dogfights which really like to happen. Oh, and beware the Kelpie. It has 10 guns and takes about 4 Harpoons to do in. Fortunately, it's a giant target.
"trolls are clearly social rejects and therefore should be isolated from society, or perhaps impaled."

-Nuke



"Look on the bright side, how many release dates have been given for Doomsday, and it still isn't out yet.

It's the Duke Nukem Forever of prophecies..."


"Jesus saves.

Everyone else takes normal damage.
"

-Flipside

"pirating software is a lesser evil than stealing but its still evil. but since i pride myself for being evil, almost anything is fair game."


"i never understood why women get the creeps so ****ing easily. i mean most serial killers act perfectly normal, until they kill you."


-Nuke

 

Offline technopredator

  • Does not compute
  • 27
  • Don't get mad, consequences are revenging you.
Re: Transcend dumb mission
@Thaeris: Thx for the advice.

That's exactly how the game works. Ships have AI classes with individual accuracy ratings.

No it doesn't, works more like this:

Quote
The first few shots have random inaccuracy while the AI gets a "fix" on you and then becomes more accurate.
and stays that way, and I doubt it has a random accuracy sub-range.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2011, 11:26:36 pm by technopredator »

 
Re: Transcend dumb mission
There's not a contradiction there. The random inaccuracy values are determined by the AI class.

 

Offline technopredator

  • Does not compute
  • 27
  • Don't get mad, consequences are revenging you.
Re: Transcend dumb mission
There's not a contradiction there. The random inaccuracy values are determined by the AI class.
I think there is because I think it doesn't stay at that random accuracy, improves and stays that way, and the accuracy sub-range should exist because you don't stay in a perfect accuracy rating as a human, you variate around that rating randomly, hence the sub-range.

 
Re: Transcend dumb mission
I agree.  :v-old: was just lazy.

But don't call it a bug. Call it a game mechanic.

 

Offline Sushi

  • Art Critic
  • 211
Re: Transcend dumb mission
If, when writing a mod, you want a bit more "human-like" inaccuracy in the AI, use $max aim update delay. It basically gives the AI a reaction time to update their aim when you change direction/speed.

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Transcend dumb mission
The AI works fine and can be modified to behave in almost any way the modder pleases. It requires no changes.

This statement:

Quote
And one feature I think really sucks in this game is that AI pilot never miss, that really stupid they should have random individual accuracy rating for each AI pilot and within that rate a random accuracy sub-range, to give the impression of realism.

is either a lie or a total misperception as ships receive AI classes which determine their accuracy, evasion and other traits.

Transcend is meant to be played for the story, not the gameplay.

Turn it down to very easy bro.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 12:25:03 am by General Battuta »

 
Re: Transcend dumb mission
On General on Insane the accuracy is 1.0... so yes, sometimes the AI is pegged to your lead indicator.

 

Offline Herra Tohtori

  • The Academic
  • 211
  • Bad command or file name
Re: Transcend dumb mission
Well beyond General AI class there's "Balls of Steele" AI class, which makes the accuracy MORE THAN ONE
There are three things that last forever: Abort, Retry, Fail - and the greatest of these is Fail.

 

Offline Shivan Hunter

  • 210
  • FRED needs lambdas!
Re: Transcend dumb mission
...which does nothing AFAIK. What's more scary is that BoS AI turns and fires faster than the player can (that is, faster than the tables dictate).

 

Offline Sushi

  • Art Critic
  • 211
Re: Transcend dumb mission
So, for the record, here's the nitty-gritty detail on how the "accuracy" modifier works, including code snippets for those to whom these things make sense.

Code: [Select]
if (aip->time_enemy_in_range > 2*range_time) {
scale = (1.0f - aip->ai_accuracy) * 4.0f;
} else {
scale = (1.0f - aip->ai_accuracy) * 4.0f * (1.0f + 4.0f * (1.0f - aip->time_enemy_in_range/(2*range_time)));
}

The "scale" factor determines how far off the aim can be: take the "ideal" point to shoot at (where the lead indicator is), add an arrow pointing a random direction, and make the arrow "scale" units long. The AI will aim at that point on the end of the arrow.

The scale variable is also affected by EMP and stealth, but we'll ignore that for now.

So, the factors that affect scale, and thus AI accuracy (in terms of not shooting at the lead indicator), are:
1. ai_accuracy: this is an AI.tbl setting ($accuracy).
2. time_enemy_in_range: this number fluctuates up and down from a variety of factors, but as implied by the name, generally goes up the longer the target is within range.
3. range_time: This number is calculated as 2.0 + ($AI In Range Time), where $AI In Range Time is an AI Profiles and/or AI.tbl setting. In Team vs Team multi missions, however, this number is just 2.0.

So, the minimum scale factor is:
(1 - $accuracy) * 4
For accuracy of 1.0, this gives a value of 0, meaning perfect aim. For an accuracy of 0, this would give a scale factor of 4.0... not perfect, but still not obnoxiously far off. Given enough time in a dogfight, the AI will converge to this equation and those values.

In the meantime, it uses this equation:
(1 - $accuracy) * 4 * (1 + 4 * (1 - time_enemy_in_range/(2*(2+$AI In Range Time))))

The bottom line is that how quickly the AI converges from least accurate to most accurate is affected by $AI In Range Time. The worst possible aim the AI can have seems to be fixed at 20 (for $accuracy = 0). It appears that accuracies outside of the 0-1 range will work, and do affect that number. Accuracy less than 0 will make the AI more inaccurate, but once you go above 1.0, accuracy starts to drop off again(see graph A).

EDIT: One more thing. There is no point in lowering $AI In Range Time below -2.0. Once it's at -2 or below, the code will always take the first branch (so the AI is always using max accuracy).

Some graphs (remember, smaller result for scale factor means more accuracy, where 0 is perfect accuracy).
A. Scale factor (y) in terms of $accuracy (x) (after AI has been in range a while)
B. Scale factor (z) in terms of $accuracy (x) and time_enemy_in_range (y) with $AI In Range Time=1.0
C. Scale factor (z) in terms of $accuracy (x) and time_enemy_in_range (y) with $AI In Range Time=3.0


This probably deserves it's own post, but what the heck.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 11:01:58 am by Sushi »