Well, it appears that we are back to the absolute truth and the first assumption once again; that's good.
Here, check this, you might like it (it's the first article in english I found about it, may not be complete - all reference material I have is in portuguese):
http://www.cuni.cz/~peregrin/HTMLTxt/sl&fs.htm
And I did only minor work on it - my most extensive proof was of the semantics of a simple text-editing language. Proving the semantics of a spoken language would require more time that I have to waste, or anyone has to waste, for that matter.
I don't have time to read all of it right now, but the translation of ideas into symbolic language has always been a topic that I have some interest in. I'll check it out later tonight.
If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em, eh?
Look at what I said from a mathematical perspective; it is a condensed version of my first fundamental assumption.
THey are "common", but when you look at them occuring alongside Israel-related events, it's more than a coincedence.
Well, yes it is, because they are definitely common enough for any country to say this. As Top Gun said, in these types of cases, people only pay attention to and publicize events that are favorable to them.
As for God remaining secret? I never said He only uses natural disasters - and even so, why are they also known as Acts of God, hmm?
Never seen this god use anything else (if even that); either he does not have the power to do it or is not interested. Either way, he will soon no longer be a threat, if we assume he exists, since natural disasters really pale in comparison to the wonders of technology.
(we already have the hydrogen bomb, but that is really nothing compared to what we will get in the future)
You want irrevocable proof of God's existance? Go outside and look at creation. Don't glance - look. Then tell me honestly that we're accidents. 
Simply looking will indeed give you such a type of view (the average man is quite ignorant, which is why religion is so common in today's world); you must carefully observe, analyze and most importantly, theorize. Why cannot we be accidents? All it takes is one IRV and the rest is set off by chemistry and evolutionary principles.
Although we don't need to be an "accident" either, but merely a continuation of a transfinite reality system. (too lengthy too explain in detail here, but I'll write about it in that book
)
Hate to break it to ya, but when it comes to His Chosen People, don't mess.
And if I do? If he sends me to hell, I would be one of the lucky few who got a chance to go there and see what it is like.
Girls are good.
Mmm, girls......
eh...girls are just other humans, as far as that goes.
You need to brush up on your Nazi propaganda, my man- it all comes out to JUST the ideology you describe.
Exactly. I do not think that Israelis are the same as the Germans in general, as even most Jews do not have this kind of bigoted view of their race. All the rational people seem to agree with me though that Hitler preached
exactly the same thing as what you are saying here about racial superiority and the chosen people of god.
It is true that Jews have been persecuted a lot in history going back to Roman times, but this is no reason for them to be a superior race. And if it says so in the Bible, how can one tell whether it is correct or not?
About the peace process: Both sides are too narrow-minded to see their own mistakes. And having Saddam sponsor the suicide bombers isn't helping. Not to mention the incredibly right-wing Likud party being in power in Israel. But that's beside the point.
Yeah, I really doubt that middle eastern conflict will come to a non-violent solution; as can be seen in this thread, people will stick to their views without foundation, and so there is no way to convince them of anything that is not simple. If either side gets a Hitler-like demagogue, then things might change, but these kinds of people usually serve to strength the already powerful spirit of war in the minds of the people, because it is a very simple idea. (rule of popular simplicity)
IMO, I think that all religions could be true in some form. The human brain has enormous amounts of untapped potential. Perhaps when someone dies, his dying mind has one last giant burst of subconscious power, which somehow creates whatever afterlife he actually believes in.
It's actually not all that powerful; once particle-based IRVs can be used for input in the computer (quantum computer, anyone?
), we will have a generic human brain right there. These will eventually progress to the point where our creations are far more advanced than ourselves (due to many minds working jointly on it), and we can finally leave our bodies (including the brain) for a better system. Some will obviously refuse, but they will not become an important factor in history anymore, due to the technological darwinism principle.
