Author Topic: OT-Religion...  (Read 137690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
Well, it certainly makes a powerful argument at any rate, if that is the best counterstatement. (besides, this thread is for such discussion anyway; my views have taken fire before but I am prepared to defend them to the death unless better ones come up :D)
« Last Edit: May 13, 2002, 11:19:06 am by 296 »

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
Quote
Originally posted by Kellan
Some people believe in God, some don't. Neither side will accept they are 'wrong' (naturally) so we're going round in a fairly big circle, though it gets better defined, and more polarised, each time. ;)


Wheee! Fuuuuun!!

* starts running in circles *

:D
Probably away. Contact through email.

 

Offline Zeronet

  • Hanger Man
  • 29
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
Well, it certainly makes a powerful argument at any rate, if that is the best counterstatement. (besides, this thread is for such discussion anyway; my views have taken fire before but I am prepared to defend them to the death unless better ones come up :D)


No that was out of order, i'd say you flamed everyone who believes in the lord.
Got Ether?

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
Quote
No that was out of order, i'd say you flamed everyone who believes in the lord.


Really, trying to put up an argument with "I'm offended" is among the worst excuses for any logical discussion; nobody should be truly "offended" by anything, so to speak, and if they are, then they should not participate in such a discussion. For example, when everyone responded to my arguments a few weeks ago with the standard "you're just a kid" response, that could have been as offensive as anything else; I just kept on arguing and put in more points to make my case and refute that bit under everyone got bored of it, and there's no reason why anyone else cannot do the same under similar situations. :p ;)

 

Offline Zeronet

  • Hanger Man
  • 29
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670


Really, trying to put up an argument with "I'm offended" is among the worst excuses for any logical discussion; nobody should be truly "offended" by anything, so to speak, and if they are, then they should not participate in such a discussion. For example, when everyone responded to my arguments a few weeks ago with the standard "you're just a kid" response, that could have been as offensive as anything else; I just kept on arguing and put in more points to make my case and refute that bit under everyone got bored of it, and there's no reason why anyone else cannot do the same under similar situations. :p ;)


Actually it was more like "your not human".
Got Ether?

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
That would be a big compliment, actually, considering how stupid humans are... :D

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
Okay, sounds cool, but that's not really an argument there, is it? :p Therefore, for the purposes of this thread Hitler can be said to be just as much a prophet of god (or god himself) as Christ.


No - perhaps for the purposes of your opinion that equation can be made - no further.

Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
Wait, but didn't you say that the Bible contained what god wanted to see in the future of humanity? And although the world is going against his wishes right now, he doesn't appear to be doing anything, so either he does not care (in which case people can sin all they want) or we are not annoying him enough. Have everyone denounce god as the great satan of humanity and change their mindset to reflect that (an easy task), and see if that gets his attention. :D


God is far far more active in this world than you think. I'll give you an example of the most "classic" way God is active in the world today: Acts of God, a.k.a. natural disasters. I can't give you the specifics at this very moment, since my dad is the one who's keeping track and he's out for another 2-3 hours or so, but the gist of it is this: When the US in particular or any other nation moves (usually politically) to urge Israel to give away the Land that has been given her to be a steward over (it's God's land, biblically speaking), a natural disaster strikes that nation.

My dad's been following this penomenon for the past 10 years or so, and the "God-incedence" is pretty amazing. No, it's not concrete proof that there is a connection, but the basis for a strong argument is definetly there. I'll post more specific info when he gets home.[/B][/quote]

Quote
Originally posted by Top Gun
Interesting, so I take it that you believe that, that all the below is the "word of god". It's amazing how people manage to pick and choose the parts of the bible that are to be obeyed and those that aren't.


Ok, first of all, three of those are taken out of context that makes the meaning clear. :rolleyes: And the one that's left, the first one, is superceeded by Jesus' specific act in the New Testament with the adulterous woman caught in the act, in John 8:3-11:

Quote
Then the scribes and Pharisees brought to Him a woman caught in adultery. And when they had set her in the midst, they said to Him, "Teacher, this woman was caught in adultery, in the very act. Now Moses, in the law, commanded us that such should be stoned. But what do You say?" This they said, testing Him, that they might have something of which to accuse Him. But Jesus stooped down and wrote on the ground with His finger, as though He did not hear.
So when they continued asking Him, He raised Himself up and said to them, "He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first." And again He stooped down and wrote on the ground. Then those who heard it, being convicted by their conscience, went out one by one, beginning with the oldest even to the last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. When Jesus had raised Himself up and saw no one but the woman, He said to her, "Woman, where are those accusers of yours? Has no one condemned you?"  
She said, "No one, Lord."
And Jesus said to her, "Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more."


As for the other 3...

Psalm 137:7-9:
Quote

Remember, O LORD, against the sons of Edom
The day of Jerusalem,
Who said, "Raze it, raze it,
To its very foundation!"

daughter of Babylon, who are to be destroyed,
Happy the one who repays you as you have served us!
Happy the one who takes and dashes
Your little ones against the rock!


Malachi 2:1-9:
Quote

"And now, O priests, this commandment is for you.
        If you will not hear,
        And if you will not take it to heart,
        To give glory to My name,"
        Says the LORD of hosts,
        "I will send a curse upon you,
        And I will curse your blessings.
        Yes, I have cursed them already,
        Because you do not take it to heart.


        "Behold, I will rebuke your descendants
        And spread refuse on your faces,
        The refuse of your solemn feasts;
        And one will take you away with it.
        Then you shall know that I have sent this commandment to you,
        That My covenant with Levi may continue,"
        Says the LORD of hosts.
        "My covenant was with him, one of life and peace,
        And I gave them to him that he might fear Me;
        So he feared Me
        And was reverent before My name.
        The law of truth was in his mouth,
        And injustice was not found on his lips.
        He walked with Me in peace and equity,
        And turned many away from iniquity.


        "For the lips of a priest should keep knowledge,
        And people should seek the law from his mouth;
        For he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.
        But you have departed from the way;
        You have caused many to stumble at the law.
        You have corrupted the covenant of Levi,"
        Says the LORD of hosts.
        "Therefore I also have made you contemptible and base
        Before all the people,
        Because you have not kept My ways
        But have shown partiality in the law."


Dealing with traitorous/corrupt priests. (Note: Levi was the priestly tribe, as well as the name of the first "member", as it were.)

And lastly, Deuteronomy 28:53. You can read the whole chapter here - it's a long one. Basically, the whole section is dealing with the curses of disobediance, as shown in verse 15: "But it shall come to pass, if you do not obey the voice of the LORD your God, to observe carefully all His commandments and His statutes which I command you today, that all these curses will come upon you and overtake you:", after which follows a very lengthy list of what God will do to those who disobey Him.

Gosh, reading that chapter again makes me ever the more thankful for the sacrifice of Jesus, so that we now live by grace and not by law. :) (No, that doesn't mean we break the law... :rolleyes: ).
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
This is getting interesting now... :D

Quote
No - perhaps for the purposes of your opinion that equation can be made - no further.


Are we assuming an absolute or perceptive truth here? By the first rule of problem-solving, the absolute one should be taken into account first because using the perceptive one, more than one independent thinking unit will not progress anywhere, rendering civilization useless. Going by the absolute truth, that statement makes no sense, since with the given variables, it violates the transitive property of quantities. :p But if we are using a perceptive one, nothing can be proved outside an independent thinker and any attempts to do so are meaningless.

Quote
God is far far more active in this world than you think. I'll give you an example of the most "classic" way God is active in the world today: Acts of God, a.k.a. natural disasters. I can't give you the specifics at this very moment, since my dad is the one who's keeping track and he's out for another 2-3 hours or so, but the gist of it is this: When the US in particular or any other nation moves (usually politically) to urge Israel to give away the Land that has been given her to be a steward over (it's God's land, biblically speaking), a natural disaster strikes that nation.


Actually natural disasters in the world are common enough for just about any country to say this if they keep a very close watch of what is happening. Again, the effect should be reproducible under similar controlled conditions by anyone else. Also, since this god is so powerful, why does he feel the need to remain in secrecy by using only natural disasters (which do not appear to be made by a god) and not simply killing off all the offenders instantly by using some uh...special god powers? Besides, we will reach a point sometime in the next 200 or so years where natural disasters will not be able to harm us at all, so what would happen then?

Quote
And lastly, Deuteronomy 28:53. You can read the whole chapter here - it's a long one. Basically, the whole section is dealing with the curses of disobediance, as shown in verse 15: "But it shall come to pass, if you do not obey the voice of the LORD your God, to observe carefully all His commandments and His statutes which I command you today, that all these curses will come upon you and overtake you:", after which follows a very lengthy list of what God will do to those who disobey Him.


As I said before, it is worth experiencing all of that for the sake of knowledge - to find out what exactly happens.

I'll wait for some other guys from the non-religious party to back me up on this one. :D
« Last Edit: May 13, 2002, 01:29:34 pm by 296 »

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
alright this thread is finaly sterting to get the right atitude,
pages of quotes
pages of bible pasages
all in single posts

yes the time soon shal come
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
Posts with real CONTENT, right? ;) :D

BTW I am used to quarreling vehemently on this subject; have had to do that many times before in my life. :D
« Last Edit: May 13, 2002, 01:30:36 pm by 296 »

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
That would be a big compliment, actually, considering how stupid humans are... :D


Hm, can you think of anything smarter than humans? :p
Probably away. Contact through email.

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
Posts with real CONTENT, right? ;) :D


Indeed. Just not the right kind of content...
Probably away. Contact through email.

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
And yes, I'm kinda derailing this, but the discussion is pointless. Now please someone try to prove me that the way that I perceive the green color is the way that everyone else perceives the green color. Or any other color, for that matter.
Probably away. Contact through email.

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
come on, you're saying that paragraphs upon paragraphs of this stuff is not CONTENT? :D This is the best topic in existence for an argument! :D

Quote

And yes, I'm kinda derailing this, but the discussion is pointless. Now please someone try to prove me that the way that I perceive the green color is the way that everyone else perceives the green color. Or any other color, for that matter.


That is actually mathematically impossible without taking any starting assumptions. :p (first fundamental rule and assumption) Without that assumption, I could say that 1+1=3 and I would be right as far as that goes. :D
« Last Edit: May 13, 2002, 02:01:01 pm by 296 »

 

Offline an0n

  • Banned again
  • 211
  • Emo Hunter
    • http://nodewar.penguinbomb.com/forum
This is so 0wned is not even funny.

*waits for Thunder*
"I.....don't.....CARE!!!!!" ---- an0n
"an0n's right. He's crazy, an asshole, not to be trusted, rarely to be taken seriously, and never to be allowed near your mother. But, he's got a knack for being right. In the worst possible way he can find." ---- Yuppygoat
~-=~!@!~=-~ : Nodewar.com

 

Offline Redfang

  • 28
Religion threads... oh well. It's good that I haven't posted more to this thread. I'm sure I miss nothing. :rolleyes: :D
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
1+1=3

 
:blah:

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
Quote
Religion threads... oh well. It's good that I haven't posted more to this thread. I'm sure I miss nothing.   :rolleyes: :D


Nah, this has to be one of the most interesting and enjoyable thread discussions ever on HLP. :D

Quote
:blah:


Okay, prove to me that 1+1=2. :D (this has actually been done by techniques in number theory, but only as far as an absolute reality goes ;))

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
come on, you're saying that paragraphs upon paragraphs of this stuff is not CONTENT? :D This is the best topic in existence for an argument! :D

Hm, as I said, it is content, just not the right type of content. ;)


Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
That is actually mathematically impossible without taking any starting assumptions. :p (first fundamental rule and assumption) Without that assumption, I could say that 1+1=3 and I would be right as far as that goes. :D

And that's exactly my point if you didn't notice it. Sandwich starts from the assumption that his faith is irrevocable proof that God exists, the same way that you assume that 1+1=2 is the basis for your whole knowledge of mathematics. You're as much right as he is, inside your very own frame of reference, and for each of you it is impossible to admit otherwise.
Probably away. Contact through email.

 

Offline an0n

  • Banned again
  • 211
  • Emo Hunter
    • http://nodewar.penguinbomb.com/forum
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
Okay, prove to me that 1+1=2. :D (this has actually been done by techniques in number theory, but only as far as an absolute reality goes ;))

1+1=2

There, easy.
"I.....don't.....CARE!!!!!" ---- an0n
"an0n's right. He's crazy, an asshole, not to be trusted, rarely to be taken seriously, and never to be allowed near your mother. But, he's got a knack for being right. In the worst possible way he can find." ---- Yuppygoat
~-=~!@!~=-~ : Nodewar.com

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
Quote
Originally posted by CP5670
Okay, prove to me that 1+1=2. :D (this has actually been done by techniques in number theory, but only as far as an absolute reality goes ;))


That's an abstract concept. What semantic value does "1" have? What semantic value does "2" have? And "+" and "="? It all comes to representations of a simple observation of reality - the same thing that Sandwich is doing. The thing is - your perception of reality is different than his, and therefore no common answer can be found.
Probably away. Contact through email.