Actually, I personally believe that the Earth was created scientifically (that is, if you want to explain it scientifically, lol).
Unless you think the Earth was created in a lab this statement doesn't work. Created scientifically.. doesn't even mean anything though I do get what you might have meant.
Earth's origins can and have been explained through scientific means. More intelligent religious people I've met do not find that this excludes the existence of god, as they've learned not to take a bunch of over-the-centuries heavily edited texts literally.
For instance, an intelligent religious person will take the story of the Adam and Eve as an anecdote designed to bring across several points, such as temptation, curiosity, etc.
The infantile orthodox types will of course take the text literally and think there were really two people, an apple and a talking snake at the start. Those same people probably think that Shrek is a Discovery Channel documentary on Ogres.
Science and religion do not have to be mutually exclusive. Indeed, if there really is a God I kind of doubt he'd have given us brains so we could just attribute everything to him and not try to figure out how stuff works for ourselves through observation and experimentation. Which is what science is all about. Now, it is up to the individual to decide whether or not God is just a story in many variants we inevitably came up with over the course of our development to cope with our own mortality and to try and explain why the sun comes down at night.
