I've been directed here by Androgeos, so I'll go straight to the point:
something like this for ships in the wiki. Yes, it's badly made. I'm only giving an example image, a properly/professionally-made one wouldn't look like this. I guess this is a discussion if it could be useful to the community and modding. Originated from the IRC, the arguments are as follows:
MatthTheGeek: Using PCS2 to open up the model and cycling through the turrets and observe the data provided is the same as using the image guide. Requires downloading PCS2, VP opening program, extraction of .pof from the .VP and opening it with PCS2.
"2 min job" to emphasize the ease, which is...true I guess, once you've got all of the programs.
"if you feel it can be useful to others, then by all means, go ahead", on the subject of the ship turret image guide.
SDM:
"Actually, that sounds like a good idea given our influx of new players recently."Hades:
"not wanting to open the model just to see which turret is which is a fair point"Shade:
"I agree. Having such pics on the wiki is a good idea to help new players" "But the MS paint job needs to be better than your example
"My opinion is that it would be simpler and faster to simply load up an image of the ship's turrets with all of them already named, for new players who may not have known of PCS2 and stuff. It would certainly be good to use the image for 'at a glance' situations without having to launch a program and cycle through the turrets to get to the one you need. Naturally I'm not expecting anyone to make them, but just see their opinions if image guides such as these would fit in the wiki.
I hope my choice of wording doesn't make me look like a fool or misinterpret my will or something, but...well (Not much of any experience making threads...I'm actually wondering if I should have made this thread in the first place).