Originally posted by LtNarol
1. No, they didn't because they let Hitler attack nearby nations and only intervened after Poland was invaded. Being harsher at the first sign would have detered Hitler.
2 The US was attacked by Japan, and did not have to enter the war in Europe; instead the US could have focused on the Pacific.
3. never heard of window, so I cant respond to that one.
4. You're forgetting the German U-boats and superior airforce, all the British had going for them was a determined (but vastly outnumbered) RAF and radar.
5. Not the case, Hitler would have gotten the the bombs at the first sign of becoming a problem for the US.
1. the war would have started earlier, that's all. The results may have been different but not by much. Unless Germany was crushed before it could attack the USSR,in whihc case Stalin would have tried too.
2. nope, you dodn't have to join. Germany would have bitten you in the arse though. Or maybe a scenario like in the movie 'Fatherland' would have unfolded.
3. ?? window??? What did Bill Gates do now?
4. you're also forgetting that the Brits had sonar. They ma not have held you, but Germany's nose would hve been bloodied.
5. maybe, maybe not. Germany would have been able to strike at the US with their 3rd generation V-weapons (2 stage rocket, range: at least to New York). Theoretically, Germany could have developed the A-bomb (we know the were working on it but post-war research has shown they were no where near completing it, or being even on the right track) while alos having the long range strike capacity to hit you.
Yes, the US effort in WW2 was very important, but so was that of the Brits and tha tof the USSR. Without either one it would have been nigh-on-impossible to stop Nazi-Germany:
- without US: In the long run Britain would have either sued for peace or be conquered. The USSR might have been conquered, or the USSR might have conquered Europeon its own.
- without USSR: if the USSR had been knocked out of the war a whole lot of troops would have become available again, despite the fact that you need a lot of men to keep a territory as vast as the USSR under control. If the USSR hadn't been attacked: Stalin would have made move sometime soon (he tried making a serious move after the war: see Berlin Crisis)
- without Britain: no D-day, no Normandy and most likely no Operation Torch either. Britain was vital for the US as a staging ground and depot. The US had to place it's men somewhere before the invasion and Britain was the place.
So instead of calling WW2 an American victory (which is a lie and pisses everyone involved off), it should be called an Allied Victory, because that was what it was. Without any one of the big allies WW2 would have been so vastly different that you wouldn't recognise the alternate timeline.