Originally posted by Rictor
I never tried to claim that the Chechens (Palestinians, Iraqi insurgents etc, depedning on the discussion) are innocent, only that both sides are guilty (to varying degrees of course).
[/b]
Well of course. However, the comparison you presented was about as useful as "Stalin was worse than Hitler".
I have made it clear on many occasions that I do not support violence against civilians, and I stand by that. I disagree with both the Chechen rebels and the Russian army's methods. But while I do not support the Russian goal, to occupy Chechnya, I do support the Chechen's goal, to end the occupation. And thats the real difference in my opinion. The end goal is still good, despite what has been done to achieve it, and though I do not support the way in which they are fighting, at least I support what they are fighting for.
[/b]
End does not justify means. I support the Chechen independence, but lately the place has been changed into a piece of **** and jihadist playground, much like Iraq. If it were just armed combat against troops, fine by me. When it comes to killing civilians, it
A) will propably definately help their course
B) will bite them in the leg
C) rest of the world supports Chechens even less.
If they want an Islamic state, so be it. Thats self-determination. And if they
[/b]
You see there's a correct ans
Also, if individual soldiers within the Russian army are not to be held respnsible, then why should individual rebels be held responsible for their actions? All of these people who held up the school, they should be set free, cause they were just following orders.
See, works both ways?
Yup. However, you stated that Russian ARMY is a terrorist, which I find a bit ridiculous claim. I was addressing that.